|
[Sponsors] |
June 23, 2011, 13:02 |
Help with choosing a viscosity model
|
#1 |
New Member
Tom
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi, I am trying to model a sort of extended foil shape 2D section and I would like to get a second opinion on the setup. The shape is a narrow rectangular section with the leading edge of a NACA foil on the front and the trailing edge on the back.
The flow is moving at 0.5 m/s with no angle of attack and the reynolds number is around 415000. I chose laminar flow for the simulation but I got some results that were unexpected. I think it is either because of vortex induced vibration or I chose the wrong viscosity model. The mesh has more than 300000 elements and is a C-shaped mesh. Any comments on this setup and model choice would be appreciated. |
|
July 1, 2011, 12:42 |
|
#2 |
Member
Adrien Lemoine
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Paris,France
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
the best for an airfoil profil in Fluent is to do the geometry as shown in the picture and use a far field fonction on the outside. You should also think about adding prism layer (3 would be enough) around the airfoil and use a k epsilon realizable with enhanced wall treatment viscosity model sincerly Adrien
__________________
------------------------------------------- Plz add reputation if the answer is correct A cœur vaillant rien d'impossible ------------------------------------------ |
|
July 4, 2011, 10:42 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Tom
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 15 |
According to the reynolds number the flow wont be fully turbulent, which is why I close laminar flow. Are you saying it will be turbulent?
Tom |
|
July 4, 2011, 12:07 |
|
#4 |
Member
Adrien Lemoine
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Paris,France
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
Yes, it will be turbulent because the velocity will increase near the naca profil.
So you should use a k epsilon model (or spalart allmaras if the computing is too slow).
__________________
------------------------------------------- Plz add reputation if the answer is correct A cœur vaillant rien d'impossible ------------------------------------------ |
|
July 4, 2011, 13:05 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Tom
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 15 |
Right, I forgot about that. I will give your suggestion a try then. One question though, what do you mean by a prism layer?
|
|
July 4, 2011, 18:09 |
|
#6 |
Member
Adrien Lemoine
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Paris,France
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
I mean the cells that will enable you to get the boundary layer
__________________
------------------------------------------- Plz add reputation if the answer is correct A cœur vaillant rien d'impossible ------------------------------------------ |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Implementing new viscosity model | prjohnston | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | July 3, 2015 05:26 |
Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model | FelixL | OpenFOAM Bugs | 27 | March 27, 2012 10:02 |
Yielding viscosity for Herschel Bulkley model | Godwin | FLUENT | 1 | December 12, 2011 06:42 |
Power Law Viscosity Model | cpplabs | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | February 13, 2008 09:09 |
Casson Viscosity model as one user define function | Zahra Rahmdel | FLUENT | 0 | November 6, 2004 06:53 |