|
[Sponsors] |
January 29, 2010, 12:50 |
What happens by doing Bandwidth Reduction?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Hey friends,
In fluent, what happens when u do bandwidth reduction by grid>reorder>domain Why and when do u do it? Thanks |
|
January 30, 2010, 13:52 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
Rep Power: 20 |
After you read your mesh in Fluent you can do the bandwidth reduction. Basically Fluent will renumber the nodes of your mesh in order to have a "more diagonal" array. This will allow you to use less memory and also the solution will converge faster.
Do |
|
January 31, 2010, 06:25 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Hey DoHander,
So basically, it means that one should make it a practice to always do bandwidth reduction after reading any mesh into Fluent... |
|
January 31, 2010, 13:54 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
Rep Power: 20 |
If you use any of the implicit solvers of Fluent yes, you should always do the bandwidth reduction. For the explicit solver this is useless.
Do |
|
February 1, 2010, 12:26 |
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks DoHander
|
|
February 28, 2013, 06:24 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Daan de Boer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0 |
I also have a question on this, till what value you need to reorder to achieve the most optimal bandwidth? Seem to me that the lower the bandwidth value the better?
|
|
April 15, 2014, 03:32 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20 |
Yup, lower the bandwidth value the better the solution will get in terms of solution time!! But you cannot control the value to which the bandwidth (of matrix) can be reduced, as it depends on the number of non-zero entries in the matrix(the matrix generated as the fluent solves the N-S equations)
|
|
July 19, 2014, 06:59 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
|
details can be found here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banded_matrix This also clearly shows why you cannot have advantage of reordering for explicit solver... |
|
July 19, 2014, 07:05 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
|
details can be found here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banded_matrix This also clearly shows why you cannot have advantage of reordering for explicit solver... |
|
October 4, 2019, 10:30 |
|
#10 | |
Member
Rasmus Iwersen
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Denmark
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Thanks /Rasmus |
||
October 4, 2019, 16:22 |
|
#11 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,754
Rep Power: 66 |
Quote:
Implicit solvers solve liner systems: e.g. Ax=b for the unknown x. When A has a lower bandwidth, certain algorithms (i.e. Gaussian elimination) are faster. Explicit solvers don't solve linear systems, they simply compute Ax=y for a new y. Regardless of the bandwidth of A, it's simple algebra. |
||
October 7, 2019, 07:59 |
|
#12 | |
Member
Rasmus Iwersen
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Denmark
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Last edited by Rasmusiwersen; October 7, 2019 at 09:26. |
||
Tags |
bandwidth reduction, fluent, reorder |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Selective catalytic Reduction | pullaiah g | Siemens | 3 | April 17, 2019 05:49 |
how to do bandwidth reduction using gambit | gambituser | FLUENT | 9 | January 31, 2010 13:52 |
fluent nox module for nox reduction using sncr | asim ibrahim | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 11, 2006 03:07 |
Bandwidth and Iterative Solvers | cfd101 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 9, 2005 13:05 |
Induced Drag Reduction | Erich | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 22, 1999 05:39 |