|
[Sponsors] |
Time step size, number of time steps and max iterations per time step |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 4, 2009, 06:07 |
Time step size, number of time steps and max iterations per time step
|
#1 |
New Member
Guido
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 16 |
I'm modeling a flow in an open-open pipe with a sinusoidal UDF. My frequency is 2000 Hz. How I can set time step size, number of time steps and max iterations per time step ? I want that it resonate so i find that it has to be 8.43cm long and 1cm of diameter
|
|
December 4, 2009, 13:34 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
karine
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi
Time step = 1/2*2000. Number of time steps: u must continue ure simulation untill u obtain a steady (oscillatory of course) solution. U will need at least that ure fluid traverse the pipe for 2 times , i mean 2*V/L Max iteration by time step: try to monitor variables...choose the max iter. as the number of iterations after what ure solution does not change anymore within a time step....(u can also add 1 iteration for security, this ure unsteadiness is not uniform) If those condirtions are so strict (take a lot of time to finish ure simulation), use NITA solver: it will give u fairly accurate solution within 1 iter by time step P.S be4 asking a question, u can say hello and at the end, u can say thanks no? |
|
December 4, 2009, 13:40 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Guido
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks a lot,you're absolutely right !
I'll try to follow your suggestions, thanks again ! |
|
December 4, 2009, 14:11 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
karine
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 17 |
No problem comrade
Anyway i forgot to tell u, for the time step i told u 1/4000 to stay conform to shannon theorem...but if u have more unsteadiness, u must use a smaller time step. URANS models are not sensible to high frequencies, so this will not be a big problem but if u are performing DNS or LES, u will need maybe to refine ure time step... There is no universal formula: the best way is to perform ure simulations with 2 different time steps and compare so u can be sure. With smaller time step, u will need less ietrations by time step. Sometimes using a smaller time step only influences rms values without influencing the mean field... Good Luck |
|
August 30, 2012, 15:49 |
how to calculate time steps required in a transient analysis
|
#5 |
New Member
abdul khader
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
I am performing FSI analysis on a elastic tube.
Total time is 0.8sec and I am using timestep of 0.005sec. How can we calculate the required no. of time steps for a total time. is there any thumb rule for this ..? or its always a guess..? kindly reply |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time step size and max iterations per time step | pUl| | FLUENT | 31 | October 23, 2020 23:50 |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 17, 2019 00:12 |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
TurbFoam problemlarge Co number | sunnysun | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | March 10, 2009 09:05 |
AMG versus ICCG | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 7, 2006 16:15 |