|
[Sponsors] |
March 15, 2006, 01:07 |
Error while running in PARALLEL
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello friends,
I am running a 3D case in parallel using Fluent on 30 nodes. I ran a case (Eps-0.41.cas) in the morning and it ran well. Again I ran the same case in the evening and I got this error. I am seeing this error quite often when I run in parallel. We are using BEOWULF cluster. Error is as follows Emergency: received SIGHUP signal. The application is busy. Please wait a moment. : Emergency: received SIGHUP signal. The application is busy. Please wait a moment. : Error: = (equal): invalid argument [1]: wrong type [not a number] Error Object: #t > invalid command [yes] > Halting due to end of file on input. parent: Failed to read len_buf Please anyone who have some idea, help me... I badly need your help... Thanks Ravi |
|
August 2, 2010, 05:57 |
same problem
|
#2 |
Member
Dokeun, Hwang
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Korea, Republic of
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 16 |
I got a problem maybe the same as Ravi's.
Emergency: received SIGHUP signal. The application is busy. Please wait a moment. ================================================== ============================ Stack backtrace generated for process id 23031 on signal 1 : fluent[0x4b68aa] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x353e2302d0] /lib64/libc.so.6(__select+0x62)[0x353e2cced2] fluent(listen_input+0x1c2)[0x4b97b2] fluent[0x4ba025] fluent(lreadf+0x2d)[0x5705dd] fluent(eval+0x7cc)[0x56b8dc] fluent(eval+0x125b)[0x56c36b] fluent(eval+0x906)[0x56ba16] fluent[0x56cd58] fluent(eval_errprotect+0x32)[0x56cde2] fluent(eval+0x2ef)[0x56b3ff] fluent(eval+0x125b)[0x56c36b] fluent(eval+0x906)[0x56ba16] fluent(eval+0x125b)[0x56c36b] fluent(eval+0x906)[0x56ba16] Please include this information with any bug report you file on this issue! ================================================== ============================ No error handler available Is anybody who has the answer? |
|
August 2, 2010, 10:55 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Dokeun,
I made the experience that it sometimes helps to read in the case on a single processor. Afterwards partition it manually for, let's say 30 knots, and then save the case and read in parallel. Sometime it helps, because it appears to me that the autopartitioning feature is not as "stable". Best regards |
|
August 2, 2010, 20:50 |
Thank you
|
#4 | |
Member
Dokeun, Hwang
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Korea, Republic of
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 16 |
Thank you for your advice, step
I think I will try it =) Quote:
It works. After 1 iteration with single processor, I ran the case in parallel. Thank you so much again. Last edited by dokeun; August 2, 2010 at 23:24. Reason: to report the result |
||
August 3, 2010, 11:01 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
I'm happy that I was able to help. You are always welcome!
Best regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Running mapFields with Parallel Source and Parallel Target | RDanks | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 4 | August 2, 2016 06:24 |
Running dieselFoam in parallel. | Palminchi | OpenFOAM | 0 | February 17, 2010 05:00 |
Statically Compiling OpenFOAM Issues | herzfeldd | OpenFOAM Installation | 21 | January 6, 2009 10:38 |
Kubuntu uses dash breaks All scripts in tutorials | platopus | OpenFOAM Bugs | 8 | April 15, 2008 08:52 |
running multiple Fluent parallel jobs | Michael Bo Hansen | FLUENT | 8 | June 7, 2006 09:52 |