|
[Sponsors] |
A question about solid surface reaction in FLUENT |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 18, 2005, 05:02 |
A question about solid surface reaction in FLUENT
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I did a case with DPM, and solid surface reaction , but the reaction didn't occur. can you give me some advise? Or can you provide me a case about this problem? thanks a lot! E-MAIL: rao_zh2000@hotmail.com
|
|
November 18, 2005, 05:29 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tdetails about my case: Reaction type is "particle surface", A particle is selected as solid species, and the injection properties is defined in DPM. Its particle type is "combusting" with "multiple-surface-model". The boundary conditions, Arrhenius Rate and other material properties are all set. But after run, the reaction rate always shows zero. why this happen ? pls help me , thank you!
|
|
November 18, 2005, 05:31 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The details about my case: Reaction type is "particle surface", A particle is selected as solid species, and the injection properties is defined in DPM. Its particle type is "combusting" with "multiple-surface-model". The boundary conditions, Arrhenius Rate and other material properties are all set. But after run, the reaction rate always shows zero. why this happen ? pls help me , thank you!
|
|
November 18, 2005, 05:46 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Reaction rates for multiple surface reactions are always displayed as zero, even if the reaction is running. Display dpm-burnout to see if your reaction is running and calculate an elemental mass balance for your case. This should give you an idea how much solid is converted.
RoM |
|
November 19, 2005, 04:15 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
send me your case. explain your phisical model Nasser_rasooli@yahoo.com
|
|
November 23, 2005, 23:14 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your answer, which certainly answered some part of my question. But there is yet another question that puzzles me. The dpm-burnout value is displayed as zero also. I thought some B.C. or properties may not be set correctly, so I checked them carefully. But no incorrect setting was found. Or DPM model with Spcies model can not be used to solve my problem: Fe2O3 thermal decomposition reaction? pls help me, thanks a lot.
RAO. |
|
November 24, 2005, 02:45 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Praticel Reaction rates are calculated with equation 14.3-8 (Fluent 6.2 manual , chapter 14). The equation includes the bulk partial pressure of a gas phase reactant so it will evaluate zero if no reactant is specified. This is probably the case in your reaction. You can override the fluents reaction rate definition with a DEFINE_PR_RATE udf. I use this for gasification reactions and it works fine.
Hope it helps, RoM |
|
November 24, 2005, 03:22 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, RoM. According to chapter 14 in Fluent 6.2 manual , equation 14.3-8 is used to calculate "the rate of the particle surface species depletion for reaction order Nr=1 ". And in my case, the order of the solid decomposition reaction is Nr=0. so the rate should be calculated by equation 14.3-9, and there isn't partial pressure of a gas phase reactant (pn)in it. I am not sure of it , can you answer me ? It is better for me to offer one of your successful case to me. You know, it has troubled me for several weeks. Thank you , thank you very meuch.
RAO |
|
November 24, 2005, 03:45 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think reaction order is determined by the exponent of the gas phase reactant. There is no description in the manual what happens if no reactant is present. From your problems i would assume that the reaction rate is then set to zero. You can test is a gas phase reactant is really needed. Just add nitrogen to both sides of your reaction (1mol in and 1 mol out). This not really realistic but if the reaction starts you have found the cause of your problems.
Good Luck, RoM |
|
November 25, 2005, 03:43 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, RoM
With your hints, my problem is solved and the reaction is running. I greatly appreciate your timely help. Thank you. But, I also found the solution is hard to converge. The residuals of continuity as well as other parameters fluctuate repeatedly. What maybe cause this? RAO |
|
November 28, 2005, 02:24 |
Re: A question about solid surface reaction in FLU
|
#11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You will get a peak in residuals every dpm iteration. If the solution start to converge those peaks will fall very fast. If you have convergence problems start with a very small dpm underrealxation. I usually start with 0,05 and increase it gradually up to 0,5. You should also monitor species concentration at the outlet to see if your solution is converging.
Good luck, RoM |
|
August 12, 2012, 03:48 |
|
#12 |
Member
leila
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 15 |
hi rao
I know this is an old topic but I have the same problem as you. I want to model a particle surface reaction. I select Combusting particles in "set injection properties" and "multiple reaction" and define the reaction but no reaction happens. how you solved your case? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Using Surface Mesh from ANSA for Fluent Sim | tommymoose | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 15 | March 3, 2016 18:29 |
surface reaction rate with udf | yellow-stuff | FLUENT | 4 | January 29, 2010 13:53 |
heat realease in wall by surface reaction (FLUENT) | Marie-Anne | Main CFD Forum | 4 | March 20, 2006 10:15 |
Modeling of solid domains in fluent, no fluid flow | Satish Perivilli | FLUENT | 2 | December 1, 2005 12:41 |
chemical reaction - decompostition | La S. Hyuck | CFX | 1 | May 23, 2001 01:07 |