|
[Sponsors] |
October 17, 2005, 10:00 |
Enhanced Wall Treatment - Thermal Effects
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I'm using Fluent 6.1 with EWT, but I'm not entirely sure what the two options (thermal effects and pressure gradients) do. From the manual, it seems that it sensitises the enhanced wall function to heat transfer effects and pressure gradients, but I'm slightly confused: Does this mean that I only need to turn on thermal effects if I expect large heat transfer to/from the boundary layer, or will I need this option to get accurate heat transfer predictions?
Thanks, Brian |
|
November 6, 2015, 00:59 |
Enhanced Wall Treatment
|
#2 |
New Member
Fluidic Heat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: India
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 15 |
http://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptu...#trb-du_dy-mod
This link will explain what this mathematically means. Beta and Gamma functions are the near wall thermal functions based on log-wall treatment, while alpha is for the pressure effects. Notice that the alpha is inversely proportional to cube of velocity, which implies that for simulations having high velocity gradients in the Boundary Layer and with Ideal Gas materials, these terms become important to be modeled. For eg. a hot gas flow from a combustor outlet must have both of these turned on, while for a case where pressure effects are predominant compared to thermal effects due to low residence times, pressure gradient effects should be enabled. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Near wall treatment in k-omega SST | Arnoldinho | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 38 | March 8, 2017 14:48 |
k-epsilon, enhanced wall treatment | mmmiichaalll | FLUENT | 4 | March 30, 2010 06:10 |
Near Wall treatment | sven | OpenFOAM | 1 | September 13, 2009 21:57 |
Wall treatment for high Pr fluid | Jessica | FLUENT | 0 | July 31, 2008 23:53 |
LES wall treatment | Valerio | FLUENT | 0 | April 26, 2008 08:12 |