CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

AMG solver divergence;

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree15Likes
  • 2 Post By Mike
  • 3 Post By zxaar
  • 2 Post By Mike
  • 5 Post By zxaar
  • 2 Post By krishnaprasad
  • 1 Post By hadikhayyamian

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 7, 2005, 18:43
Default AMG solver divergence;
  #1
Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I've been performing a grid size study on the case that I'm currently working on and received the error message after approximately 20 time steps:

divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction primitive error at Node 0: floating point exception. Error: floating point exception. Error Object: #f

This error message repeats itself for nodes 1-3. The case is unsteady 2D flow past a rectangular plate in a duct. I'm using a structured grid with 825,000 cells, PISO P-V coupling, and my pressure discretization is set to 2nd order. My case is running in parallel using 4 processors. I previously ran this case using 170,000, 325,000, and 500,000 cells with no problems. I changed the under-relaxation factors to 0.2 and 0.5 for pressure and momentum respectively, but still get the error message after approx. 15-25 time steps. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Oula and jzc like this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2005, 18:52
Default Re: AMG solver divergence;
  #2
zxaar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
change the pressure discretisation to standard, it should not give this error, if it gives then examine your case closely because then the problem is with set up not with discretisation. Fluent is very stable solver.
pezarello86, Oula and Masroor like this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 2005, 16:51
Default Re: AMG solver divergence;
  #3
Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks, switching the pressure over to standard seems to have solved the problem.
Hayder Mohammed and Masroor like this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 11, 2005, 23:38
Default Re: AMG solver divergence;
  #4
zxaar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you wish to switch back to second order , you can do it, once you have some order of convergence by standard scheme.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2005, 14:44
Default Re: AMG solver divergence;
  #5
Endee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, Is this true for the 3D-unsteady as well? As I am trying to do a 3d flow over circular cylinder using DES but from the very beginning it gives the NAN (division by zero). Any comments (As i have tried both segregated and couple solvers with same result). Cheers, Endee
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2005, 18:40
Default Re: AMG solver divergence;
  #6
zxaar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have been doing 3D unsteady cylinder calculations, and yes fluent can give you problems if you chose second order scheme in the start. In fact, i am able to make fluent diverge with 2000 cells, with 1m/s velocity inlet, if i started with second order. You can always switch to higher order schemes after you have some degree of convergence. This is generally true.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2005, 06:43
Default Re: AMG solver divergence;
  #7
Endee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thanks...Zxaar Just some queries about simulation with 3D unsteady cylinder at vel of about 70m/s and temp 300 K with legth to dia 2-1. How did you specify the boundary condition? What time step do you recommend and what should be the data saving frequecy to capture the unsteady vortices? cheers, Endee
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2005, 19:01
Default Re: AMG solver divergence;
  #8
zxaar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i have been mostly working around of flow 60m/s, and with LES i have been using 1E-05 as time step since i am using sliding mesh aproach for rotation. You can use NITA also if you do not have any rotating parts. (with sliding mesh NITA always diverges). i am using vel inlet, pressure outlet, with operating condition 0 pressure
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2010, 10:29
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Rich
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 17
dralosdir is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by zxaar
;124022
change the pressure discretisation to standard, it should not give this error, if it gives then examine your case closely because then the problem is with set up not with discretisation. Fluent is very stable solver.
i have that problem too. where can i set the pressure discretisation to standard?
dralosdir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2010, 02:58
Default
  #10
New Member
 
krishna
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16
krishnaprasad is on a distinguished road
hi all
i am working in ansys 12.1 fluent to generate waves using udf. during the solution it is showing,,divergence detected in the AMG solver and stopped the iteration.??
i had tried many times ...can you please help me.

and also i don't know how to set unsteady flow and non iterative time advancement solver controls..please help me.
thank you in adv
kaissi and Triality like this.
krishnaprasad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 19, 2011, 23:43
Default
  #11
New Member
 
jhthoh
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 15
jhthoh is on a distinguished road
where can i set the pressure discretisation to standard? i m using ANSYS 12.0 fluent
jhthoh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2011, 10:21
Default Re: AMG solver divergence
  #12
New Member
 
Ignacio
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16
sanjose is on a distinguished road
Hi! I'm trying to determine a residence time distribution of a plug flow reactor by calculation of an advection-diffusion equation for a tracer (scalar transport) using a user defined scalar (uds).
I receive this message:
divergence detected in AMG solver: uds-0
Primitive Error at Node 2: floating point exception


How can solve this problem?
Thank you.
sanjose is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 20, 2011, 01:25
Default
  #13
Member
 
Khayyamian
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 15
hadikhayyamian is on a distinguished road
@ dralosdir :
If u r using Fluent 6.3.26 and u would like to set the pressure discretisation to standard then follow:
Main Menu > Solve > Controls > Solution... Under Discretization set Pressure to Standard.
Hayder Mohammed likes this.
hadikhayyamian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2013, 07:52
Default
  #14
New Member
 
rami sosta
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
skander is on a distinguished road
Hi guys ,

i am simulating a flow around a naca profil, using fluent
when i run the calculation it stops and gives this msg

Error: Floating point error: invalid number

Error Object: ()

do you have a solution for this problem?
skander is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2013, 09:40
Default
  #15
Member
 
EMAVI V SURYA SAMPATH
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 15
sampathevs is on a distinguished road
Thats means, your BC's are wrong !
sampathevs is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2013, 11:15
Default Error message - Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
  #16
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13
msbhatti123 is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

I am doing wind analysis around buildings. Analysis is working fine on single building but around many buildings it is giving me few errors as mentioned below. I used same set up of single building and same boundary conditions. one more things why software is generating more walls in analysis and showing me some interface problems. Thanks in advance for your answers.

Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction

and

Note: zone-surface: cannot create surface from sliding interface zone.
Creating empty surface.
msbhatti123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 9, 2014, 08:30
Default
  #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 231
Rep Power: 16
Kanarya is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I have problem with uds.. residual seems ok but still it is stopping..
PHP Code:
Updating solution at time levels N and N-1.
 done
.
  
iter  continuity       u-gas     u-solid       v-gas     v-solid       uds-0       uds-1    vf-solid     time/iter
 10750  8.8121e-11  2.2626e-12  6.1116e-16  1.3528e-13  6.3501e-17  3.8446e-03  1.3206e-06  3.7602e-15  0
:00:28  100
eta_r
0.430262
tau_c
12.2609
tau_x
0.0164504
tau_t
18.5566
abs_v
3.76477
abs_v1
3.76477
abs_v2
3.76476
 10751  2.2053e-03  5.7549e-05  1.1280e-04  1.4713e-05  4.0489e-06  2.5946e-03  1.9169e-04  1.8546e-05  0
:00:32   99
eta_r
0.430485
tau_c
12.2609
tau_x
0.0164553
tau_t
18.5415
abs_v
3.7617
abs_v1
3.7617
abs_v2
3.7617
 10752  1.5026e-03  2.0906e-05  3.6006e-05  5.0037e-06  1.2944e-06  2.5935e-03  1.7131e-04  9.5630e-06  0
:00:31   98
eta_r
0.430556
tau_c
12.2609
tau_x
0.0164568
tau_t
18.5367
abs_v
3.76073
abs_v1
3.76073
abs_v2
3.76073
 10753  1.9169e-03  2.0543e-05  1.1497e-05  1.8165e-06  4.1447e-07  2.7509e-03  1.5509e-04  4.9279e-06  0
:00:30   97
eta_r
0.430579
tau_c
12.2609
tau_x
0.0164573
tau_t
18.5352
abs_v
3.76041
abs_v1
3.76041
abs_v2
3.76041
# Divergence detected in AMG solver: uds-0 -> Increasing relaxation sweeps!

Divergence detected in AMG solveruds-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver
uds-1
Warning
An error or interrupt occurred while reading the journal file.
Some commands may not have been completed.

Halting due to end of file on input
do you have any idea?
thanks in advance!
Kanarya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 14, 2015, 14:01
Default
  #18
bia
New Member
 
nabaouia
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 12
bia is on a distinguished road
if it doesn't work you can chege it to second order
bia is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Divergence detected in AMG & FMG solver..... devesh.baghel FLUENT 2 July 30, 2018 23:39
Error: Divergence detected in AMG solver siri FLUENT 8 March 12, 2018 18:08
Error: Divergence detected in AMG solver: species-0 -> Increasing relaxation sweeps ksiegs2 FLUENT 2 June 18, 2012 12:26
Divergence detected AMG solver error Rub Nawaz Khalid FLUENT 2 August 14, 2010 12:01
divergence in AMG solver Aly FLUENT 1 November 11, 2004 14:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:32.