|
[Sponsors] |
August 2, 2002, 07:46 |
Turbulent Schmidt Number
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi. For the past few months I have been modelling the movement of neutrally buoyant dye through a pipe with the species model in Fluent 5.5. I have found that altering the turbulent Schmidt number from 0.5 to 1.5 makes a 300% difference to the results. I know Fluent claims that a value of 0.7 is generally OK, but does anybody know if there is more detailed information for pipe flow. Thanks John
|
|
August 13, 2002, 08:06 |
Re: Turbulent Schmidt Number
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't know about your precise configuration or modelling practices, but for classical developed pipe flow with passive heat or species transport, the turbulent Prandtl/Schmidt number varies from around 0.9 at the wall to 0.6 at the flow axis. Experimental data exists which permits determination of the Prandtl number variation across the pipe. It can be deduced from measurements of the mean velocity profile, mean concentration profiles and the radial profiles of the Reynolds shearing stress and radial turbulent concentration/heat flux.
|
|
August 13, 2002, 14:08 |
Re: Turbulent Schmidt Number
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for your reply. Can you give me the reference for variation in the turbulent Schmidt number for a pipe? Also is the Prandtl and Schmidt number the same thing? Thanks once again. John
|
|
August 14, 2002, 07:50 |
Re: Turbulent Schmidt Number
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I will dig out the reference. The Prandtl and Schmidt number will be the same when dealing with passive contaminents.
|
|
August 15, 2002, 03:31 |
Re: Turbulent Schmidt Number
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The references are:
Launder, "Heat and Mass Transport" in Turbulence, Chapter 6, Ed. Bradshaw, Springer, Berlin, (1978). Reynolds, "The prediction of turbulent Prandtl and Schmidt numbers", Int.J.Heat Mass Transfer, Vol.18, p1055, (1975). Hinze, "Transport of a scalar quantity in wall turbulence" in Turbulence, 2nd Edition, Chapter 7, McGraw Hill, (1975). |
|
August 27, 2002, 10:23 |
Re: Turbulent Schmidt Number
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry for the delay, but I now have the references. I will have a look and let you know how I get on. Thanks once again for your time. John
|
|
August 29, 2002, 12:04 |
Re: Turbulent Schmidt Number
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have now looked through the references - I had now idea the issue was so complicated! I have found a further reference you may be interested in:
The height dependence of the turbulent Schmidt number within the boundary layer, Koeltzsh 2000, from the journal of atmospheric environment (I think). Thanks once again for your time. John |
|
May 31, 2015, 23:36 |
|
#8 |
New Member
yunhaifeiyang
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11 |
In Fluent, the default schmidt number is 0.85 for conventional fluid (air and water et al.), but for heavy metal (lead bismuth eutectic et al.), its schmidt number is larger than 1.0. So I want to set it 4.22 instead of 0.85. But I don't know how to do it? Use UDF? Please help me!
|
|
June 1, 2015, 06:04 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Cees Haringa
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Delft
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
If you go to viscous to set the turbulence model, there is a column on the right with a number of constants. if you have species enabled, this will include the turbulent schmidt number as well. Best, Cees |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low Reynolds number k-E Turbulent Model | Sohail | FLUENT | 19 | July 16, 2020 15:08 |
Problem with decomposePar tool | vinz | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 18 | January 26, 2011 03:17 |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |
Question on Schmidt number | ap | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 26, 2008 19:58 |
Turbulent Cylinder Strouhal Number | Chetan Kadakia | FLUENT | 3 | October 10, 2002 04:31 |