|
[Sponsors] |
Cannot change periodic zones back to standard zones (walls) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 17, 2021, 07:31 |
Cannot change periodic zones back to standard zones (walls)
|
#1 |
New Member
Max E
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5 |
Hi folks,
is there a way to revert periodic faces back to standard ones? In my case, a mesh created with ICEM features periodic faces for both the fluid and solid parts of the geometry. Fluent also automatically detects them as periodic. Previous work has shown that for better accuracy of the solution, the periodic zones of the solid need an additional heat flux to be defined, which is not possible with periodic boundary conditions. So how can I convert the periodic zones back to standard wall zones? As far as I know, the TUI does not feature an option or command for that, or I could not find it. Thanks in advance! Cheers, Max |
|
June 17, 2021, 12:07 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Max E
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5 |
The fix was easier than expected and a bit unintuitive to be fair. Deleting the periodic definition did not delete the zones themselves, it rather only deleted the periodic references (choose the periodic face in project tree -> right click -> "delete" below "type" || or similar path). You can use the resulting non-periodic faces as usual.
|
|
June 18, 2021, 06:03 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Marcin
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Poland, Swiebodzin
Posts: 313
Rep Power: 13 |
i can say that if U define periodic in simulation and U copy this simulation to ran next analysis U will get error and program will be stopped. This is additional thing for periodic definitions in fluent - I dont know when They repair this bug
__________________
Quick Tips and Tricks, Tutorials FLuent/ CFX (CFD) https://howtooansys.blogspot.com/ |
|
August 31, 2021, 11:04 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Lukas Fischer
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Germany, Munich
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
it does not work for my case. I get this error message in the console: "Error: Zone 30 is currently being used by a mesh interface and cannot be slit" Zone 30 is the symmetry patch. I tried to split the period mesh but it results in the same error message. /mesh/modify-zones> slit-periodic Periodic zone [()] 30 Moreover, this patch is not used in any of the mesh interfaces... Any suggestions? |
||
August 31, 2021, 11:49 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Lukas Fischer
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Germany, Munich
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
In a similar Fluent case I am able to delete all mesh interfaces and afterwards I was able to delete the periodic patches. |
||
August 31, 2021, 15:27 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66 |
I can't follow what is zone 30. If zone 30 is a symmetry BC then it's not periodic and you shouldn't be trying to use slit-periodic on zone 30, you should be using zone 30 on the periodic zone.
There are two types of periodic thingies in Fluent. There is a periodic interface and there is a periodic pair-zone BC. The periodic pair shows up at one zone or one BC. The periodic interface has multiple in addition to the interface. slit-periodic is for breaking the single periodic pair into two distinct surfaces which is usually not also a periodic interface unless you have made a mistake setting up your case, which can easily happen when you import your mesh into Fluent. Breaking a periodic interface is done by simply deleting the interface. |
|
September 1, 2021, 04:07 |
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
Lukas Fischer
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Germany, Munich
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Hi, thanks for clarification. Zone 30 was created by pairing of two patches (which I referred to as symmetry patches but they could also be used as periodic patches) by the command: /mesh/modify-zones> make-periodic |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Friction at walls between porous zones | roupcik | FLUENT | 0 | April 22, 2013 02:41 |
Friction at walls between porous zones | roupcik | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 22, 2013 02:40 |
HELP! Periodic Problem | foxer | FLUENT | 1 | June 27, 2012 09:00 |
different conditions for multiple periodic zones | CLINT_E | FLUENT | 0 | April 19, 2010 14:23 |
Tecplot 9 - periodic zones | David | Tecplot | 0 | February 8, 2005 19:26 |