|
[Sponsors] |
Energy conservation (total heat transfer rate) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 18, 2020, 22:08 |
Energy conservation (total heat transfer rate)
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi,
I would have a naive question about energy conservation on Fluent. Background: My domain is very simple: BL flow over a flat plate. Problem: If I calculate the total heat transfer rate at the inlet (Report>Fluxes>Total heat transfer rate) and I compare it with the value I get from CFD-post: areaInt(Density*Velocity u*CP*T0)@inlet, the two results are completely different. By checking the energy balance from Report>Fluxes>Total heat transfer rate, energy conservation is respected. However, it is not with CFD-post. Am I doing something wrong? Thank you in advance. |
|
November 19, 2020, 03:53 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Moritz Kuhn
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Germany, Dresden
Posts: 218
Rep Power: 17 |
Check if you have the same reference state for calculating the enthalpy. Maybe in Fluent Total heat transfer rate at a flow boundary is only massflow by enthalpy, without the kinetic part. But I'm not sure.
|
|
November 19, 2020, 06:47 |
nusselt number
|
#3 |
New Member
physics baali
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello every one
my geometry is 3D flat plate solar collector i want to ask you about calculating Nusselt number in fluent i try in fluent -report-surface integral-area weight average-wall flux- surface nusselt number but the result is incorrect please help me how can i found correct result |
|
November 19, 2020, 08:25 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
Therefore, if I work out areaInt(Density*Velocity u*CP*(T0-298.15[K]))@in I get the same result that comes from the total heat transfer rate calculation. By adopting Tref, the energy balance holds on CFD-post as well. What puzzles me is whether Tref=298.15K is also used to calculate the wall heat flux. Any idea? Thank you in advance. |
||
November 19, 2020, 08:42 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Moritz Kuhn
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Germany, Dresden
Posts: 218
Rep Power: 17 |
I would say, the value of the wall heat flux at a flow boundary is quite meaningless if you consider the single value. It is only usable for the caluclation of the energy conservation (sum up of all wall boundaries), because in this case you don't care about the reference state.
|
|
November 19, 2020, 15:14 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6 |
For stationary flows, I get a pretty good approximation in terms of energy balance.
On the other hand, I am still experiencing a severe energy imbalance in the turbulent regime (implicit LES). Is there a quick way to assess the energy balance for transient flows with Fluent? Thank you in advance. |
|
November 19, 2020, 16:01 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Lorenzo Galieti
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 375
Rep Power: 12 |
Which one are you controlling for imbalance? Average one or istantaneous one?
|
|
November 24, 2020, 11:59 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
Lei Chen
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 16 |
The Nu number and HTC calculation in Fluent depends on the ref temperature settings, please make sure you set a meaningful reference value in the Reference Values panel before calculating heat transfer coefficients.
https://www.afs.enea.it/project/nept...ug/node972.htm Quote:
|
||
November 29, 2020, 05:51 |
|
#9 | |
New Member
physics baali
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
|
||
November 29, 2020, 05:55 |
|
#10 | |
New Member
physics baali
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
|
||
Tags |
energy balance, heat transfer convergence |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flow around heatsink with heat transfer | S Mughal | FLUENT | 0 | April 13, 2018 14:06 |
Error in run Batch file | saba1366 | CFX | 4 | February 10, 2013 02:15 |
natural convection | mehrdadeng | CFX | 10 | February 25, 2011 06:25 |
Total Heat Transfer Rate & Total Surface Heat Flux Mismatch | icaro | FLUENT | 0 | November 24, 2009 08:01 |
Why FVM for high-Re flows? | Zhong Lei | Main CFD Forum | 23 | May 14, 1999 14:22 |