|
[Sponsors] |
Whether to use Conjugate heat transfer model or Shell conduction |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 3, 2020, 16:42 |
Whether to use Conjugate heat transfer model or Shell conduction
|
#1 |
New Member
Dilu
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
I am trying to solve how the heat is transferred in as Solid body with multiple layers (pls see attached image). The small layer seen is the heat source and the other layers have different materials. I am new to Ansys fluent and I have researched that the heat transfer problem could be solved in fluent by using Conjugate heat transfer model or shell conduction, My Question is can I use both the methods for this problem? if so how could I use shell conduction method? Is there any resources I could read and look into to learn how to use the above 2 methods other than Ansys user guide? Thank you for your time. |
|
March 4, 2020, 01:27 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,762
Rep Power: 66 |
There appears to be only a solid? Then this can't be a conjugate heat transfer model (there's no fluid). Shell conduction model isn't even applicable either.
In this scenario, you just mesh the solid and solve the heat equation in the solid by brute force. |
|
March 12, 2020, 04:15 |
|
#3 |
Member
Mattia
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 8 |
I have a question: what if a solid covered with another material is inserted into a air volume? How should I define the boundary conditions? In my case the energy residuals are very high and I'm using a density base solver with k-e model and s2s radiative model.
It has been hunting me for days, usually my residuals are very low but this time I cannot reach a satisfing solution. Thanks everybody |
|
March 12, 2020, 07:48 |
CHT or Shell Conduction or Thin Wall
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
|
Conjugate Heat Transfer is meant to be used if the objective is to predict thermal field inside the solid domain. If that is not the objective and only the effect of solid needs to be included on the thermal field in the fluid zone, either shell conduction or thin wall model can be used. Of course, CHT can still be used but would be an overkill. Thin wall to be used only if thermal diffusivity is high enough. Usually, it is mentioned that thin wall is to be used for thin walls but that is incorrect notion. If the thin wall is made of insulation material with very low thermal diffusivity or anisotropic thermal conductivity then thin wall as well as shell conduction model is invalid.
Could not understand the statement below Quote:
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
||
March 12, 2020, 09:07 |
|
#5 |
Member
Mattia
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 8 |
It is actually simper than that. I'm simulating a boiler filled with hot water, covered with an insulating material, into a closed space. my big problem is the energy residual which looks very High. however the energy conservation is verified.
|
|
March 12, 2020, 09:20 |
Setup
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
I am afraid that I could not really understand the setup. So, I have a few questions.
Is it the boiler that is covered by an insulating material? If yes, is it covered on all sides? And are you trying to model the boiling phenomenon as well? Do not use density based solver. It is meant to be used with flow having Mach number higher than 2.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
March 12, 2020, 09:31 |
|
#7 |
Member
Mattia
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 8 |
I assumed the temperature of the water inside as a constant. The tank is covered almost completely, only the hydraulic connections are in contact with the air volume
|
|
March 12, 2020, 09:38 |
Insulation
|
#8 |
Senior Member
|
If the objective is to predict the thermal energy transfer through the insulation and thermal field within the insulation, then you have to use CHT with natural convection simulation of the surrounding air. If the objective is to predict the flow of the air around the boiler due to natural convection, then shell conduction will do the job.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
March 12, 2020, 10:00 |
|
#9 |
Member
Mattia
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 8 |
Thank you very much for your answer I'm actually trying to predict the thermal energy transfer inside the insulator, the doublt regarding my action are given by the high residuals but I guess that I'll need to revisit the BCs and the mesh.
|
|
March 12, 2020, 10:04 |
Setup
|
#10 |
Senior Member
|
The most important point is to look at the flow. Since the flow of air around the boiler is most likely incompressible, use Boussinesq approximation or incompressible ideal gas. If you are not modeling the natural convection of air, then it is not really a CFD scenario since there is only thermal energy transfer by conduction and/or by radiation. Then, you just need to solve energy equation. Disable Flow equation in that case.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
conjugate heat transfer in OpenFOAM | skuznet | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 99 | March 16, 2017 06:07 |
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions | Moinul Haque | CFX | 4 | November 25, 2014 18:30 |
Conjugate heat transfer: coupled wall temperature | Sarah | FLUENT | 7 | August 12, 2013 23:36 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 07:28 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |