|
[Sponsors] |
Is it possible to give each band different emissivity in Fluent Radiation? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 30, 2020, 20:40 |
Is it possible to give each band different emissivity in Fluent Radiation?
|
#1 |
New Member
jswony11
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi, I'm trying to model radiation with box (1 bottom + 4 side is aluminum, upper case is material A)'
Geometry is simple : Cube with 6 side (1 bottom / 4 side / 1 top) 1. When you use radiation model - Discrete radiation and Solar Ray Tracing in Solar Load, you can change spectral fraction (V/V+IR) What is difference between visible and infrared in Fluent radiation? I know that visible is nearly 300nm~700nm and infrared is 700nm~, but does ANSYS Fluent separate visible and infrared region with wavelength range as I mentioned above? Or do they just separate them by energy percetage regardless of wavelength? ex) Direct Solar Irradiation = 1000W/m^2 Spectral Fraction = 0.5 -> Visible 50% (=500W/m^2) + Infrared 50% (=500W/m^2) 2. How can I give different transmissivity with more than 3 wavelength region? I used Discrete Ordinates (DO) Model since it is the only model with 'semi-transparent' and 'non-gray' mode. I want to give material A (semi-transparent) transmissivity like this: ex) t=0.9 in 300~700nm t= 0.1 in 700~8000nm (0.7 ~ 8 micro-meter) t=0.9 in 8000nm~13000nm (8 ~ 13 micro-meter) (t is transmissivity) But when I change BC type of upper case (material A) from opaque to semi-transparent in boundary condition - radiation tab, there is only transmissivity (and absorptivity on left side) of Direct Visible and Direct IR. I made three band (300~700 / 700~8000 / 8000~13000) in Model - Radiation - Number of Bands, but I could only change Direct / Diffuse Irradiation and Diffuse Fraction of each band, not transmissivity or emissivity of each band. Is it possible to give each band different emissivity? I'll be glad if someone could give me some advice. |
|
January 31, 2020, 05:13 |
Three inputs
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Fluent expects three values, one for IR, one for visible and other for shading. So, you have 0.9 for first value, 0.1 for second, and 0.9 for rest.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
September 22, 2021, 02:27 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
Dear swony11 send me polinomial or other expression for scattering and rest term for the bands1-3 0.3-0.7microm 0.7-8 and 8-13 as you wrote early. It's very need to me. |
||
July 25, 2023, 06:03 |
|
#4 |
New Member
marwane cherkaoui
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 3 |
hello, I think you first need to choose the 3 bands in the radiation section (DO method), then you choose gray-band for the absorption coefficient in the materials section and finally semi-transparent in the boundary conditions for each wall. You will find the variation in absorption and transmission for each band (below in the boundary conditions in the radiation section). I hope this solves your problem
|
|
Tags |
radiation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Running UDF with Supercomputer | roi247 | FLUENT | 4 | October 15, 2015 14:41 |
Radiation Modeling | Chris89 | CFX | 20 | August 14, 2014 08:51 |
GETVAR Error in Multiband Monte Carlo Radiation Simulation with Directional Source | silvan | CFX | 3 | June 16, 2014 10:49 |
Radiation - Emissivity | crevoise | STAR-CCM+ | 3 | December 20, 2013 12:42 |
Radiation in Fluent | Arpit | FLUENT | 12 | June 18, 2007 13:57 |