CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Stabilizing **** to enhance linear solver robustness - between iterations message

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By LuckyTran
  • 2 Post By Far

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 7, 2020, 00:38
Unhappy Stabilizing **** to enhance linear solver robustness - between iterations message
  #1
New Member
 
Hassan Mandour
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Hassan Mandour is on a distinguished road
Hello guys,
I'm simulation flow over NACA0012 equipped with vortex generators, constructed many 3D meshes on ICEM with the same cell distribution (and count) and various spanwise lengths, (so the quality metrics aren't varying much for those cases).

Solver: Pressure-Based, Coupled with Pseudo-transient
Model: k-w SST
Re = 1.5 M
B.Cs: Velocity Inlet, Pressure outlet, Periodic sides, walls for Airfoil surface & vortex generators.
Initialization: Hybrid then FMG

for some cases that went completely fine, however, for other cases I encounter the following message between Hybrid initialization iterations:
"Stabilizing ads-0 to enhance linear solver robustness."
and when starting the calculation I encounter another message:
"Stabilizing Pressure coupled to enhance linear solver robustness."
which causes convergence difficulties (may eventually converge tho, for lower angles of attack), what frustrates me is that this setup worked extremely well for some meshes!

I searched alot and can't find any reason for that!
I have attached pictures of the mesh and quality comparison between one of the nice cases (without those messages) and one of the problematic cases.
Thank you for your help ♥

Mesh:
https://ibb.co/98jn9kb
https://ibb.co/8mCq0NG
https://ibb.co/fG2LK1S
Mesh metrics comparison (the beauty and the beast :'D):
https://ibb.co/Y3ysTKM
Hassan Mandour is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 7, 2020, 13:00
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
It's a warning, not necessarily an error. Also if it's only in the initialization, it won't affect the converged solutions afterwards.


The warning is pretty much self-contained. The solver algorithm didn't converge and it had to resort to a more robust algorithm. A kindergarden example would be: when Newton-Raphson fails to find a root, you switch to a binary search algorithm.


If you rely on an automated initialization procedure, eventually you'll run into a case where it isn't smart enough to do its thing.
vsammartano and mathru like this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 7, 2020, 18:50
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Hassan Mandour
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Hassan Mandour is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your reply, sir.
the message about stabilizing pressure is displayed in the solution itself, indeed it's not affecting the converged solution but it's causing some convergence difficulties (especially in the early iterations), I can live with that, I'm just wondering why it worked fine for some cases and not another, and if there's anything I'm missing that may cause this problem.

Another thing _and excuse my ignorance_, I can't understand what you mean by:

"If you rely on an automated initialization procedure, eventually you'll run into a case where it isn't smart enough to do its thing."

Again thank you for your precious time.
Hassan Mandour is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2021, 05:13
Default
  #4
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
I made a detailed study on same issue and here is video: https://youtu.be/HPsBuqWH9FY
riverajor and Muhammad Waseem like this.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 5, 2024, 10:52
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Muhammad Waseem
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 2
Muhammad Waseem is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far View Post
I made a detailed study on same issue and here is video: https://youtu.be/HPsBuqWH9FY
Really informative video, Thank you
Muhammad Waseem is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 5, 2024, 10:54
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Muhammad Waseem
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 2
Muhammad Waseem is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far View Post
I made a detailed study on same issue and here is video: https://youtu.be/HPsBuqWH9FY
Really informative video, Thank you. I was having the same problem " Stabilizing pressure coupled to enhance linear solver robustness" I changed the the number of processors from 10 to 1, then my problem solved 😁
Muhammad Waseem is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
airfoil 3d, fluent, vortex generators


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
laplacianFoam with source term Herwig OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 17 November 19, 2019 14:47
[solids4Foam] How to calculate drag coeff when using solids4Foam amuzeshi OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction 15 November 7, 2019 13:50
Suppress twoPhaseEulerFoam energy AlmostSurelyRob OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 33 September 25, 2018 18:45
Unstabil Simulation with chtMultiRegionFoam mbay101 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 December 28, 2013 14:12
calculation stops after few time steps sivakumar OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 March 17, 2013 07:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:02.