CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

2D higly underexpanded jet

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 17, 2019, 10:46
Smile 2D higly underexpanded jet
  #1
New Member
 
Gianmario Ledda
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
Gianmario28 is on a distinguished road
Hi, I work for my master thesis and I must study an higly underexpanded jet due to an accidental release of methane from a pressurized pipe.
I try to work with a 2D geometry but I have different results from 3D to 2D geometry and I don't understand why.
In 3d I have a result in according with the theory, meanwhile in 2D I'm not able to reach it.
I use Fluent 18.2
I use a convergent nozzle, with a pressure inlet
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3d.jpg (193.5 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg 2d.jpg (45.6 KB, 31 views)
Gianmario28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2019, 11:11
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,743
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
What are we looking for?


The nozzle contours are different.


Even if the contours are the same, you are doing a 2D slot versus (we can't see it but presumably) a 3D axissymmetric nozzle.


Maybe an apples to apples comparison rather than an apples to elephant comparison would be more helpful?
Gianmario28 likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2019, 11:31
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Gianmario Ledda
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
Gianmario28 is on a distinguished road
Tank you for the answer LuckyTran. I already fix the contours of the nozzle and now are the same, but my problem is the same. I have my 3D problem, but because I have a radial simmetry I decide to study the problem in 2D, and according with the theory the result must be the same that I have reached in 3D. So the theory says that I can study my problem in 2D and the velocity field must be similar to 3D image. But I'm not able to do this.
Do you think that I must study also my 2D problem like axissymetric?
Gianmario28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2019, 11:57
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Gianmario Ledda
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
Gianmario28 is on a distinguished road
LuckyTran, I understand and solve my problem, thank you so much.
Gianmario28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2019, 05:18
Default
  #5
New Member
 
akash gupta
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
akashgupta is on a distinguished road
Hello

I am working on CD Nozzle (2D Model) simulation in ANSYS Fluent- (real time project). The Inlet conditions are: Pressure =0.6mpa and Temperature = 588.6 k. Expected outlet Temperature is around 350 k.
As I am trying to simulate in Fluent, after few iterations, I am getting a reverse flow on pressure inlet and pressure outlet and there is also a reduce in time step due to excess temperature change.
How can I resolve these kind of errors that will help me to in the simulation.
can you help me
plz
akashgupta is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
ansys 18.2, fluent 18.2, jet


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Acoustic Model of Slightly Underexpanded Supersonic Jet Not Working ZNoel FLUENT 0 March 9, 2018 18:09
How does the dissipation of a supersonic underexpanded jet depend on grid fineness gauthamnarayan Main CFD Forum 1 July 2, 2015 07:50
Re: Underexpanded jet BC kiran Main CFD Forum 2 December 26, 2010 12:17
problem with highly underexpanded free jet Raaf Phoenics 11 April 8, 2009 13:36
underexpanded jet flozzermeister Main CFD Forum 0 November 10, 2006 06:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:48.