|
[Sponsors] |
Difference between Axisymmetric and Symmetric Boundary condition |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 25, 2019, 05:46 |
Difference between Axisymmetric and Symmetric Boundary condition
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 357
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi All
I have a very basic question about the difference between Axisymmetric and Symmetric Boundary condition in fluent. When should I use Axisymmetric and when can I use symmetric boundary conditon ? I am trying to simulate a bubble rise from an orifice at the center of a Cylindrical pipe containing water. So in this case doing 2D simulation, I took a plane and at one corner I inject the bubble with a parabolic velocity profile. so now my doubt is if I should use Symmetric boundary or Axisymmetric boundary. Some people told me that if I use symmetric boundary at oneside then its like a planer and its for Square channel or rectangular channel. So I must use axisymmetric boundary condition. But as far as I understand, if I have to do some simulation for a circular channel then I will have to do by taking a wedge out of the cylinder and give periodic boundary condition for two sides. But then its not 2D anymore then. Kindly let me know what is the difference here if I want to do a 2D simulation for a cylindrical geometry. |
|
January 25, 2019, 10:51 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 221
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
2D axisymmetric means that circumferential derivatives of flow variables (pressure, velocity etc.) are zero. It means that you assume that the solution should not change in circumferential direction and this assumption allows you to use axisymmetry. Symmetry would mean your channel is rectangular, that is right. Because you want to analyse cylindrical domain, you really cannot use symmetry. The closer approximation is using the axisymmetry in your case. Beware that any bubble which will not be in the axis of rotation will actually be treated as toroid (circle revolved around axis) and this is likely not a correct approach. I guess your problem is 3D. I did not understand what you mean by taking a wedge out of a cylinder.. Basically in Fluent a 2D axisymmetry analysis of cylinder should be done as a rectangle whose one side is coincident with "x" axis - this is axis of rotation. And there is no need to take a wedge out or even set periodicity. Periodicity will be set automatically around "x" axis by switching the solver to 2D axisymmetry. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Symmetric and Axisymmetric Simulation | MikeITA | FLUENT | 0 | September 15, 2017 00:38 |
symmetry boundary conditions in cfx | lost.identity | CFX | 41 | May 22, 2013 08:21 |
Difference between periodicity and symmetry boundary conditions | lost.identity | Main CFD Forum | 9 | August 30, 2012 12:16 |
Boundary condition in an axisymmetric 2D flow | jinwon park | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 23, 2012 14:55 |
what is the difference between 2D and axisymmetric | Q | FLUENT | 1 | April 4, 2006 04:37 |