CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Is this project converged? (Imbalance mass flow rate between outlets and inlets!)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By blackmask

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 30, 2018, 09:48
Question Is this project converged? (Imbalance mass flow rate between outlets and inlets!)
  #1
Roh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 9
Roh is on a distinguished road
Guys
I'm simulating an axisymetric nozzle and trying to measure its thrust. So tried to measure mass flow rate but it doesn't make any sense to me because suming the mass flow rate of Inlets and outlets are not in balance(its summing is not zero). Here is a screenshot of the mass flow rate.




As you can see Net Result is not zero. why?
I was thinking that maybe my problem is not converged completely. Here is a screenshot of the Residuals of this timestep:




Isn't this project converged?
Attached Images
File Type: png Untitled1.png (28.7 KB, 14 views)
File Type: png Untitled.png (13.7 KB, 17 views)
Roh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2018, 21:31
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 421
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 22
blackmask will become famous soon enough
The major inlet flow is from one of the boundary named "outlet2". If this boundary is actually one of the outlet boundary type, you might consider changing it to one of the inlet boundaries, or you must set the reversing flow parameters carefully.
Roh likes this.
blackmask is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2018, 00:56
Default
  #3
Roh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 9
Roh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmask View Post
The major inlet flow is from one of the boundary named "outlet2". If this boundary is actually one of the outlet boundary type, you might consider changing it to one of the inlet boundaries, or you must set the reversing flow parameters carefully.
"outlet2" and "outlet1" are "Pressure farfield" and "outlet3" is "Pressure outlet". To prevent of revers flow I chose these boundries. Here is a screenshot of setting for "outlet1" and "outlet2"




And here is a screenshot of setting for "outlet3"




I chose this magnitude for Intensity and Viscosity ratio because the nozzle flow is injecting to the air and I don't expect any reverse flow. What do you think about this setting?
Attached Images
File Type: png 1.png (13.6 KB, 13 views)
File Type: png 2.png (19.1 KB, 13 views)
Roh is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mass imbalance problem in multiphase water and steam CFX case Antech CFX 1 October 26, 2020 05:03
2 inlets, 2 outlets. Assessment of flow rate ratio. Jiricbeng CFX 9 May 22, 2018 06:29
Y-pipe mumtaz ersan FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 4 January 15, 2015 17:19
rate flow FLUENT rayan24 FLUENT 3 July 25, 2013 04:26
sos! How to define the flow rate of outflow BC? zjm FLUENT 0 June 4, 2004 10:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:22.