CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Mesh Interfaces not showing - Cooling Plate

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By tom96
  • 3 Post By AlexanderZ

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 23, 2018, 15:42
Default Mesh Interfaces not showing - Cooling Plate
  #1
New Member
 
Tom
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
tom96 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I have a problem with the mesh interfaces on fluent. I want to model a cooling plate with a straight cooling channel with a liquid coolant.

I have uploaded a screenshot of my cooling plate within ANSYS Fluent. As you can see from there the "Mesh Interfaces" command is not there.
This command should be in the tree on the left - see other screenshot.

I need to set the mesh interfaces to enable the coupled wall option so that the heat can be transfered correctly. I believe that this problem may be caused by my original geometry.

Does anyone has any suggestions on how to solve this?

How can I modify the settings in order to show the mesh interfaces command in the tree on the left?

Thanks!

Tom

PS: I have already tried to create a manual contact region in the design modeler.
Attached Images
File Type: png mesh interface.PNG (9.4 KB, 51 views)
File Type: jpg plate2.jpg (97.1 KB, 64 views)
Vinay94 likes this.
tom96 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2018, 01:03
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34
AlexanderZ will become famous soon enoughAlexanderZ will become famous soon enough
You don't see interfaces because of your mesh, because of the way, you'd generated it.
If you are using design modeler than it looks like you put all created bodies into one part so the fluent detected one body with different zones inside.

so if you want to have interfaces, just put bodies into different parts.

But for your case -> conjugate heat transfer from fluid to solid, your mesh is correct, you don't need to use interfaces in such simple case. (usually interfaces are been using in cases where it is really difficult (expensive) to make conform mesh)

So you have 2 zones solid and fluid. Fluent will generate coupled boundary condition between them automatically! (it will have the same name with word shaodw at the end, for instance "channel_wall" and "channel_wall_shadow")

best regards
tom96, Vinay94 and Ben_Hmouda like this.
AlexanderZ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2018, 08:50
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Tom
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
tom96 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderZ View Post
You don't see interfaces because of your mesh, because of the way, you'd generated it.
If you are using design modeler than it looks like you put all created bodies into one part so the fluent detected one body with different zones inside.

so if you want to have interfaces, just put bodies into different parts.

But for your case -> conjugate heat transfer from fluid to solid, your mesh is correct, you don't need to use interfaces in such simple case. (usually interfaces are been using in cases where it is really difficult (expensive) to make conform mesh)

So you have 2 zones solid and fluid. Fluent will generate coupled boundary condition between them automatically! (it will have the same name with word shaodw at the end, for instance "channel_wall" and "channel_wall_shadow")

best regards
Hi Alexander,

Thanks for the reply. I followed your advice for simple geometries and didn't create any interfaces. However, no shadow walls were automatically created by fluent (In this case I haven't created any contact regions between the fluid domain and the plate).

I proceeded with the transient simulation anyway by enabling the energy equation. Setting the inlet velocity to 1 m/s, inlet temperature to 250K while the plate temperature to 300K.

I am uploading my results here. No heat transfer seems to happen between the solid and the fluid. Is there something else I should do when setting-up the simulation prior to running it?

Thank you in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: png Cooling Plate.PNG (77.5 KB, 21 views)
File Type: png fluid domain.PNG (12.7 KB, 16 views)
tom96 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2018, 13:49
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Tom
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
tom96 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom96 View Post
Hi Alexander,

Thanks for the reply. I followed your advice for simple geometries and didn't create any interfaces. However, no shadow walls were automatically created by fluent (In this case I haven't created any contact regions between the fluid domain and the plate).

I proceeded with the transient simulation anyway by enabling the energy equation. Setting the inlet velocity to 1 m/s, inlet temperature to 250K while the plate temperature to 300K.

I am uploading my results here. No heat transfer seems to happen between the solid and the fluid. Is there something else I should do when setting-up the simulation prior to running it?

Thank you in advance.
I think I found my problem, the inlet velocity was too high. Thanks.
tom96 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 24, 2024, 11:12
Default
  #5
Member
 
Numan Mazumder
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: India
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 7
siddiquesil is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderZ View Post
You don't see interfaces because of your mesh, because of the way, you'd generated it.
If you are using design modeler than it looks like you put all created bodies into one part so the fluent detected one body with different zones inside.

so if you want to have interfaces, just put bodies into different parts.

But for your case -> conjugate heat transfer from fluid to solid, your mesh is correct, you don't need to use interfaces in such simple case. (usually interfaces are been using in cases where it is really difficult (expensive) to make conform mesh)

So you have 2 zones solid and fluid. Fluent will generate coupled boundary condition between them automatically! (it will have the same name with word shaodw at the end, for instance "channel_wall" and "channel_wall_shadow")

best regards
I want to create an interface between two different types of fluids. The velcoity components along the common interface should be zero for both fluid, but pressure and temperature information should pass through the interface. Is it possible?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg heat_pipe.jpg (105.3 KB, 3 views)
siddiquesil is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cooling plate, heat transfer, mesh interfaces, problematic geometry


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 24 June 27, 2016 09:54
Mesh interfaces error amin.z FLUENT 0 July 2, 2014 08:20
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 07:21
Frozen Rotor 1:1 Mesh Connection pharley CFX 5 January 31, 2013 17:15
[snappyHexMesh] Layers:problem with curvature giulio.topazio OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 10 August 22, 2012 10:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03.