|
[Sponsors] |
November 5, 2017, 18:13 |
Mass Flow Residual Convergence Problem
|
#1 |
New Member
Tosbaga
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello Everyone,
I am currently trying to simulate a wind tunnel experiment with a Delta wing inside it. The problem is with the mass residual which i cannot drop it below an order of E-4. The other residuals are converging nicely. I have used an adequate mesh with the following qualities, Max Skewness : 0.86, Max Aspect Ratio : 56, Min Orthogonal Quality : 0.13 I am confident that the element size is suitable for my simulation. I am using PBCS with a SST k-w turbulence model, Inflations layers are produced with a first layer thickness which will produce a y+ value of ~1. Computational domain consist of a Velocity inlet, Pressure outlet,Symmetry, Wind tunnel walls and delta wing as wall also. I have tried to lower the relaxation factors as well but it didnt cause any significant effect on the mass residual. I am also monitoring the Cl and Cd coefficients and after 2000 iterations they do not change. I also checked the mass flux difference between inlet and outlet an its of order E-9 close to zero too but I feel like I cannot rely on the solution because of the mass residual. Do i miss something i dont know. Help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, |
|
November 6, 2017, 02:59 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Moritz Kuhn
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Germany, Dresden
Posts: 217
Rep Power: 17 |
Why you would like to reach a residual for the mass lower than 1E-3, which is the default value and for the most cases fully sufficient, as you can see on your mass flux balance?
Keep in mind that the flow in your steady state case could have a little transient, time dependent character, that could be the reasen for not lowering the mass residual further. |
|
November 6, 2017, 12:49 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Tosbaga
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
I have considered unsteadiness but there is none in my case. Could you recommend some other suggestion ? Regards. |
||
November 7, 2017, 08:39 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Moritz Kuhn
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Germany, Dresden
Posts: 217
Rep Power: 17 |
Sorry no more hints. It depends also what for a precision do yo need. Normally I have with 1E-3 for the mass residual good consonance betwenn simulation and reality.
Moritz |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with chtMultiregionFoam radiation boundary condition | baran_foam | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | December 17, 2019 18:36 |
Free surface issues with interDyMFoam for hydroturbine | oumnion | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | October 6, 2017 15:05 |
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam turbulent case | Aditya Patil | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | April 24, 2017 23:13 |
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam | chrizzl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 28, 2017 06:49 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |