CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Mismatch of given initial value of pressure with the value in final results

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 17, 2017, 08:18
Angry Mismatch of given initial value of pressure with the value in final results
  #1
New Member
 
sameer hasan
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 9
sameerhad12 is on a distinguished road
I am trying to simulate the flow of air inside a rectangular 2D geometry (slightly tapered at the end). I give the initial value of pressure about 261kPa in solution initialization and in the inlet boundary condition. but after the solution is converged the results are totally absurd. In final results the initial value shown is about -0.5 bar at the inlet which does not matches with the already given inlet boundary conditions. Please help me out
sameerhad12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2017, 12:58
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Make sure you realize there are two inputs. The actual pressure boundary condition and an initial (gauge) pressure.

For subsonic flows, the supersonic / initial gauge pressure dialogue box is not a boundary condition.

The value in that box is used only for initialization AND only if you "select from" that boundary. Otherwise, the initial pressure is from something else (the user set value if you use standard, or whatever boundary was actually selected)

Other than initialization, the value that is in the initial gauge pressure dialogue box is moot, it does nothing.
sameerhad12 likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2017, 04:46
Default
  #3
New Member
 
sameer hasan
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 9
sameerhad12 is on a distinguished road
thanks you for your answer but I already try this but I get the same absurd results. Please tell me that what boundary condition I will give at outlet? I am using a pressure outlet condition with 0 gauge pressure at outlet. at inlet I am giving velocity inlet condition with 2.6 bar at inlet
sameerhad12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2017, 04:58
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by sameerhad12 View Post
thanks you for your answer but I already try this but I get the same absurd results. Please tell me that what boundary condition I will give at outlet? I am using a pressure outlet condition with 0 gauge pressure at outlet. at inlet I am giving velocity inlet condition with 2.6 bar at inlet
I have no idea what you mean by absurd but... can you clarify how you specify both velocity and pressure? Is 2.6 bar the static pressure or stagnation/total pressure?

What is your equation of state?

Did you remember stagnation temperature also?

Velocity inlets are tricky because they can easily end up being ill-posed. The problem is probably the velocity inlet and not the pressure outlet, unless you have like a choked flow then the pressure outlet can be anything and your flow is determined only by upstream conditions. Anyway, lots of scenarios to consider.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2017, 02:02
Default
  #5
New Member
 
sameer hasan
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 9
sameerhad12 is on a distinguished road
here I attached the boundary conditions of air T0 and P0 are stagnation and T and P are static
Attached Images
File Type: png cond.PNG (12.1 KB, 6 views)
sameerhad12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2017, 02:33
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
But what did you specify in Fluent? You can't specify all 5 of those things, only 3 of them.

What is your equation of state? Depending on which EOS you use, you may also need to set the operating pressure.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2017, 09:19
Default
  #7
New Member
 
sameer hasan
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 9
sameerhad12 is on a distinguished road
I specify only static conditions i.e of pressure, temperature and velocity. I am only using ideal gas law as EOS i.e pV=mRT. The operating pressure is 1 bar i.e atmospheric, it is taken as default value.I didn't disturb it. will it effect the simulation?
sameerhad12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
mismatch value


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Maximum number of iterations exceeded chtmultiregionsimpleFoam Moncef OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 28 July 13, 2020 15:26
Wrong fluctuation of pressure in transient simulation caitao OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 March 5, 2015 22:33
Unstabil Simulation with chtMultiRegionFoam mbay101 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 December 28, 2013 14:12
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence jonmec OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 July 28, 2011 06:24
Problems with simulating TurbFOAM barath.ezhilan OpenFOAM 13 July 16, 2009 06:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:04.