|
[Sponsors] |
Natural convection through fin in Ansys FLUENT |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 12, 2016, 06:09 |
Natural convection through fin in Ansys FLUENT
|
#1 |
New Member
Hifjur
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello, Can anyone help me to get out of this?
I m modeling a natural convection heat transfer through a fin in a closed fluid domain. Base temperature of fin is 400K and ambient temperature is 300K. Can I use boussinesq approximation for this? If i use boussinesq approximation what should be the value of density? And what should be the value of other thermophysical properties like thermal conductivity, thermal expansion coefficient, specific heat? Thank you in advance for your time. |
|
March 12, 2016, 12:34 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,762
Rep Power: 66 |
Quote:
The Boussinesq approximation is a constant property approximation (an incompressible fluid) but allows you to get buoyancy forces. Thus I think all properties should be constant properties when simulating using the Boussinesq model to be consistent with the Boussinesq model. Of course you can still choose variable properties, but if you are going to choose variable thermal conductivities and such, why would you not also choose a variable density, the most basic material property? In my opinion these are all selected by you. It's up to you how detailed you want your simulation to be. Why not just use constant thermal properties for everything? Do you need variable properties for what you are trying to do or study? What is their added benefit? What do you hope to achieve? |
||
March 13, 2016, 01:59 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Hifjur
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
I am using constant thermal properties for my simulation. my only confusion is that while using boussinesq approximation, with respect to which temperature should I take the values of thermal properties? density should be should be taken with respect to ambient temperature and pressure i got it. what about the other parameters? Should i take those in film temperature( 400+300/2)K in my case or at 300K? |
||
March 13, 2016, 02:11 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,762
Rep Power: 66 |
Quote:
If you want variable properties, then make them truly variable and don't use the Boussinesq approximation since density and hence the buoyancy force is a first order effect (from your equation of state). The other thermophysical properties are higher order. |
||
March 14, 2016, 03:31 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Hifjur
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
But to calculate rayleigh number and nusselt number the fluid properties should be taken at the film temperature. so if take these at the reference temperarue(ambient, 300K in my case) wont it give absurd result? and if I take the film temperature as the reference temperature(360K) will it give accurate result using boussinesq approximation and density values at 360K?
|
|
March 14, 2016, 07:20 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Hifjur
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
|
||
March 14, 2016, 09:21 |
|
#7 | ||
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,762
Rep Power: 66 |
Quote:
The film temperature is not an average of ambient and wall temperature but an average of the temperature of the fluid far from the wall and temperature of the fluid right next to the wall. In a constant property simulation, it does not matter what temperature you compute the properties at because they are all the same. Now the question is where do you get these constant properties? These can be evaluated at the film temperature or whatever, but once they have been chosen you never need to revisit the film temperature again because you have constant properties everywhere. If you want to be doing accurate simulations with property variables, then do so and stop using Boussinesq. Then the film temperature is applicable. Quote:
|
|||
March 15, 2016, 01:55 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Hifjur
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Is it possible to model natural convection heat transfer using boussinesq approximation for temperature difference of 120K. Ansys tutorial suggests that boussinesq approximation is valid only for low temperature difference. Can anyone know what is the limiting temperature difference for which boussinesq is applicable. If I cant use boussinsq approximation what other method I should use?
|
|
March 15, 2016, 02:03 |
|
#9 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,762
Rep Power: 66 |
Quote:
All you need is to get the correct density to get the correct buoyancy force. You just need to provide a reasonable equation of state for the density. It can be a table, curve fit, a formal equation like the ideal gas law of real gas law. I would not worry about these petty details until you've simulated something first, regardless of whether or not it is 100% valid. You were having a lot of trouble before with properties in general. |
||
March 16, 2016, 12:52 |
|
#10 | |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
I am also trying to analysis natural convection in a closed domain. Which solver method should I use? I have tried both boussinesq and ideal gas model with pressure-velocity coupled pseudo transient solver. The ideal gas model is more reasonable than the boussinesq. However, the residuals are very high, continuity is about 10^1 and energy is about 10^-3 . I will refer last case's film temperature and air's properties in corresponding temperature difference. However, as I said , is the pressure-velocity coupled pseudo transient solver good for closed domain? Best regards. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Running UDF with Supercomputer | roi247 | FLUENT | 4 | October 15, 2015 14:41 |
How to solve natural convection problem in fluent? | samantasubho | FLUENT | 7 | April 17, 2014 03:07 |
gambit in Ansys FLuent 13 | saharesobh | FLUENT | 0 | August 1, 2012 16:30 |
natural convection problem with radiation | jorien | CFX | 0 | October 14, 2011 10:26 |
Natural Convection BC | yipseng | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 20, 2010 21:54 |