CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Improve Orthogonal Quality within Fluent

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ptstorey

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 14, 2015, 11:04
Default Improve Orthogonal Quality within Fluent
  #1
New Member
 
Peter Storey
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12
ptstorey is on a distinguished road
I've done some shape optimisation (with adjoint solver) and the orthogonal quality has dropped from higher than 0.9 down to 0.5, and I'm beginning to see signs that the solution is struggling to converge.

What is the best way to refine/ improve orthogonal quality of the mesh?
So far I have tried Mesh > Smooth/Swap which has made it better, but I don't really know what I'm doing.

Thanks!
Vinay94 likes this.
ptstorey is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2015, 12:16
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Tanmay Inamdar
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11
Tanmay95 is on a distinguished road
It will be better if you can do it in your mesher.Using a finer mesh helps.
Tanmay95 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2015, 03:37
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11
maverick123 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Read mesh in Fluent mesher. Use mesh/tool/auto-node-move command.
You can give a try with various dihedral angles.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptstorey View Post
I've done some shape optimisation (with adjoint solver) and the orthogonal quality has dropped from higher than 0.9 down to 0.5, and I'm beginning to see signs that the solution is struggling to converge.

What is the best way to refine/ improve orthogonal quality of the mesh?
So far I have tried Mesh > Smooth/Swap which has made it better, but I don't really know what I'm doing.

Thanks!
maverick123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2015, 09:51
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Peter Storey
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12
ptstorey is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanmay95 View Post
It will be better if you can do it in your mesher.Using a finer mesh helps.
My mesh is pretty fine already. My problem is that I can't take my .msh file back across to ICEM-CFD... unless you know a way of doing it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick123 View Post
Hi,

Read mesh in Fluent mesher. Use mesh/tool/auto-node-move command.
You can give a try with various dihedral angles.
I haven't used Fluent mesher before, is it accessible from the Fluent main window?


Thanks for you replies
ptstorey is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2015, 03:22
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11
maverick123 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

While launching Fluent standalone (not through WB) you can find toggle to launch in Meshing Mode.
maverick123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2015, 07:25
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Peter Storey
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12
ptstorey is on a distinguished road
Ah I see. I'm currently working in 2D, and meshing mode isn't an option when selecting 2D. Is there a way around this?

Thanks
ptstorey is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 19, 2015, 06:00
Default
  #7
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11
maverick123 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

You can not modify 2D mesh in fluent meshing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptstorey View Post
Ah I see. I'm currently working in 2D, and meshing mode isn't an option when selecting 2D. Is there a way around this?

Thanks
maverick123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 24, 2015, 09:54
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 13
revilo82 is on a distinguished road
I think the ortho quality (>0.1) is ok for CFD and Adjoint. After some optimization loops not only the mesh changed but the flow situation, too. That (could be) the reason for convergence issues. The question is, how does the "solution is struggling to converge"? Does it diverge, oscillate, do you see some instabilities, slow convergence, ... ?
revilo82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2015, 13:57
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
prafulla145 is on a distinguished road
orthogonal quality close to 1 is good, first try with default max face area, max and min sizing setting.If not then with trial and error obtain orthogonal quality close to 1. Orthogonal quality less than 0.001 is very poor.
prafulla145 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Tips on how to improve the quality of this mesh crimsoncabbages ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 September 12, 2014 07:26
[Other] Using mesquiteMotionSolver to improve mesh quality. icaroaccordi OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 August 6, 2014 09:59
Mesh quality and wall function in FLUENT - k-omega model newcomer ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 May 19, 2011 04:00
Improve smoothness & quality of structured grid quarkz Main CFD Forum 2 March 10, 2007 16:26
High Quality Image from Fluent Mike FLUENT 4 September 7, 2005 08:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:45.