|
[Sponsors] |
February 14, 2015, 11:04 |
Improve Orthogonal Quality within Fluent
|
#1 |
New Member
Peter Storey
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12 |
I've done some shape optimisation (with adjoint solver) and the orthogonal quality has dropped from higher than 0.9 down to 0.5, and I'm beginning to see signs that the solution is struggling to converge.
What is the best way to refine/ improve orthogonal quality of the mesh? So far I have tried Mesh > Smooth/Swap which has made it better, but I don't really know what I'm doing. Thanks! |
|
February 15, 2015, 12:16 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Tanmay Inamdar
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11 |
It will be better if you can do it in your mesher.Using a finer mesh helps.
|
|
February 16, 2015, 03:37 |
|
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi,
Read mesh in Fluent mesher. Use mesh/tool/auto-node-move command. You can give a try with various dihedral angles. Quote:
|
||
February 16, 2015, 09:51 |
|
#4 | ||
New Member
Peter Storey
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for you replies |
|||
February 17, 2015, 03:22 |
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi,
While launching Fluent standalone (not through WB) you can find toggle to launch in Meshing Mode. |
|
February 17, 2015, 07:25 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Peter Storey
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12 |
Ah I see. I'm currently working in 2D, and meshing mode isn't an option when selecting 2D. Is there a way around this?
Thanks |
|
February 19, 2015, 06:00 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11 |
||
June 24, 2015, 09:54 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 13 |
I think the ortho quality (>0.1) is ok for CFD and Adjoint. After some optimization loops not only the mesh changed but the flow situation, too. That (could be) the reason for convergence issues. The question is, how does the "solution is struggling to converge"? Does it diverge, oscillate, do you see some instabilities, slow convergence, ... ?
|
|
August 3, 2015, 13:57 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
orthogonal quality close to 1 is good, first try with default max face area, max and min sizing setting.If not then with trial and error obtain orthogonal quality close to 1. Orthogonal quality less than 0.001 is very poor.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Tips on how to improve the quality of this mesh | crimsoncabbages | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | September 12, 2014 07:26 |
[Other] Using mesquiteMotionSolver to improve mesh quality. | icaroaccordi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | August 6, 2014 09:59 |
Mesh quality and wall function in FLUENT - k-omega model | newcomer | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | May 19, 2011 04:00 |
Improve smoothness & quality of structured grid | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 10, 2007 16:26 |
High Quality Image from Fluent | Mike | FLUENT | 4 | September 7, 2005 08:41 |