CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Results from REAL experiment and FLUENT are not equal ?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By kad

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 19, 2014, 15:38
Default Results from REAL experiment and FLUENT are not equal ?
  #1
New Member
 
Ravi Laohasurayodhin
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
notecool24 is on a distinguished road
Hi, I am new in FLUENT

Form the picture I have attached, I made an experiment of fluid flow in the long tube (2.6 mm in diameter) and I used two pressure catheters to measure pressure from each part (45 mm far away from each pressure sensor).

So, in my FLUENT I created a pipe that has length only 45 mm and try to set boundary conditions at inlet and outlet as pressure-inlet/outlet and insert pressure data that I collected from experiment to check that the result which is velocity will be the same.

At pressure-Inlet I set Gauge total pressure to 1866 pascal (14 mmHg)
At pressure-Outlet I set Gauge pressure to 1200 pascal (9 mmHg)
At operating pressure, which I still not 100% understand in it , I set it as 0.

However, the result (Flow in pipe) from Fluent is not the same from experiment and it seem that the pressure at inlet was dropped to be like around 12750 ??

What make this simulation wrong ? Or setting pressure from experiment as inlet and outlet of the pipe are the wrong idea for FLUENT ? Also how to make the pressure at inlet doesn't drop too much or I need to set something to make FLUENT known that this inlet pressure must remain constant ?
Attached Images
File Type: png Untitled.png (3.4 KB, 18 views)
notecool24 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2014, 15:54
Default
  #2
kad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 200
Rep Power: 24
kad will become famous soon enoughkad will become famous soon enough
The input for pressure inlet is total pressure. In your experiment you measured only static pressure. Operating pressure btw. is obsolete for incompressible flow.
notecool24 likes this.
kad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2014, 17:16
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Ravi Laohasurayodhin
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
notecool24 is on a distinguished road
So, what is the best boundary condition for me to put into this model at inlet and outlet.I tried to put velocity inlet (because I know the flow in the tube) and keep the outlet-pressure the same from the experiment. However, the result from simulation show difference in pressure inlet compared to real experiment.
notecool24 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2014, 18:41
Default
  #4
kad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 200
Rep Power: 24
kad will become famous soon enoughkad will become famous soon enough
I guess your velocity distribution is uniform over the inlet. So it is no wonder results are not good.

For fully developed pipe flow try periodic boundary condition with mass flow input: http://aerojet.engr.ucdavis.edu/flue...g/node1355.htm
kad is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
heat transfer with RANS wall function, over a flat plate (validation with fluent) bruce OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 January 20, 2017 07:22
Discrepancy between sectional Cp and experimental results on tip (ONERA M6) pdp.aero SU2 2 March 9, 2015 21:26
Fluid volume in fluent vs experiment otubaba FLUENT 4 December 12, 2013 14:14
FLUENT not even close to experiment khoopes FLUENT 0 March 9, 2012 13:55
Comparison OpenFOAM Fluent Experiment andras OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 20 June 20, 2011 16:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:40.