|
[Sponsors] |
fluent shows that the the interface zone overlap |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 3, 2013, 06:18 |
fluent shows that the the interface zone overlap
|
#1 |
Member
aysiyi
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 14 |
hi
everyone . I was simulationg a centrifugal fan ,and i decompose the fan into threeparts: the inlet zone ,the blade zone and the volute zone ,and the zones were connected with interface. when i initialize my case ,fluent show the warning message: Info: Interface zones overlap for mesh interface in2. This could adversely affect your solution. can somebody tell what i shroud do ? or what the message means ? thanks! |
|
December 22, 2013, 08:56 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 13 |
I have the same problem... Did you find out what was wrong?
Please advice |
|
December 25, 2013, 21:34 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Can you please tell me what you did to get rid off this error
|
|
February 2, 2015, 06:35 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 732
Rep Power: 23 |
First of all it is not an error. Rather a warning or information as it suggests. It merely means that the meshes on the surfaces sharing the interface are not matching. The only way to overcome this is to enforce 'matching' (on the surfaces sharing in the interface) during mesh generation
|
|
March 9, 2015, 10:44 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Abdiwe
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Vienna
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Can u please tell me how can i enforce matching? Ramadan |
||
March 10, 2015, 05:39 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 732
Rep Power: 23 |
In anys meshing, you can right-click on the 'Mesh' and select 'Match Control'. Then select high and low faces. Also select 'Axis of Rotation'. Thats it!!
|
|
March 9, 2016, 12:50 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Camila
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11 |
||
April 9, 2016, 06:53 |
control maching
|
#8 |
Member
behrouz
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 11 |
hey mila.d.b
yes for mesh that already is you enforce control maching right click on mesh---->control maching. then choose the faces you need to mach the mesh and an axis then generate mesh agian. thats it |
|
May 19, 2016, 14:44 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Fadi hajj
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 10 |
hello guys,
i am experiencing the same problem, did anyone solve this problem yet? please help |
|
April 13, 2017, 12:44 |
sliding mesh in train aerodynamics
|
#10 |
New Member
Sucker
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10 |
I am working on Effect of wind pressure on electricity poles along the train track lines induced by the movement of high speed trains. I have created my train model and the electricity poles. I created the first boundary condition which contains only the train model and I also created the second boundary condition that contains both the first boundary condition and the electricity poles. I used this method because the train is in the dynamic region (sliding mesh) while the electricity poles are on the static region. I created two inlets and outlets with respect to the two boundary conditions am using.
My question: I want to implement sliding mesh but I did not see mesh interface in the setup tree and my structured mesh didn't fail. How can i activate the mesh interface in my fluent model? Thanks |
|
August 22, 2017, 11:21 |
|
#11 |
New Member
majid fahim
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
can anyone tell me how to solve this problem using Icem
Interface zones overlap for mesh interface interface. This could generate left-handed faces on the interface and make it invalid for use. |
|
April 7, 2018, 10:40 |
|
#12 |
New Member
Alamu
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8 |
In Ansys fluent setup-Mesh interface- Enforced is there.
|
|
October 27, 2019, 05:05 |
|
#13 |
New Member
AHMAD ABOULKHAIL
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Turkey
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 8 |
I have activated this option but unfortunately this option only applies to flat surfaces and at the same time no more than one surface can be selected (if the upper and lower surfaces consist of several surfaces) in this option. Is there another option to match the surfaces in this case in ANSYS FLUENT.
|
|
June 2, 2020, 14:40 |
overlapping issue solution
|
#14 |
New Member
yasaman
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I had overlapping problem for several days and here is how I fixed it:
My geometry consisted of two parts (a sweep and an extruded with a sweep cut) and I had designed it in Solidworks. At first, I noticed that the surface area of my parts’ contacts are not equal. Therefore, instead of swept cut, I used “subtract” in “combine” section in Solidworks to design my second part, and have equal contacts. After importing my geometry into Ansys Workbench, I shared my geometry in Spaceclaims as to have one part that includes all my bodies. In Ansys meshing, since there is just one part, contact areas would have same mesh size and type and no overlapping. |
|
November 21, 2020, 12:02 |
|
#15 | |
New Member
frantsesko
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
a bit late to reply ,but you go to "Boundary Conditions" then you choose the boundaries that consist your interface and you select "interface" . Having done that you will be able to see "Mesh Interface" on the "Setup" tree ,so you click on it and create a "Matching Interface" . |
||
Tags |
fluent, interface, overlap |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Commercial meshers] fluentMeshToFoam multidomain mesh conversion problem | Attesz | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 12 | May 2, 2013 11:52 |
Reference zone in Fluent | akash | FLUENT | 1 | March 13, 2013 17:39 |
How to set the interface in Fluent? | akash | FLUENT | 0 | February 4, 2013 04:39 |
Porosity profile, dividing a zone, or getting zone location from zone | khoopes | FLUENT | 0 | June 2, 2012 20:39 |
Fluent incident radiation problem | Michael Schwarz | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 21, 1999 06:56 |