|
[Sponsors] |
January 10, 2013, 11:49 |
Residuals flow around cylinder
|
#1 |
Member
Pedro Ramos
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello there!
What you think about this residuals for the flow simulation around a cylinder? Q=0.02 m3/s h=0.10 m diameter of cylinder=48mm transient and LES turbulence model http://i45.tinypic.com/352je61.jpg |
|
January 11, 2013, 10:56 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
Can you show us the grid?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
January 11, 2013, 11:12 |
|
#3 |
Member
Pedro Ramos
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 14 |
Of course, thanks.
|
|
January 11, 2013, 11:27 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
Hey,
i) Is this 2d? ii) Did you try any other turbulence model / stationary case and got better convergence? iii) Did you try to improve the grid? It looks like you have several "jumps" in your mesh size... although I wouldn't expect the residuals to behave like this due to these jumps...
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
January 11, 2013, 11:30 |
|
#5 |
Member
Pedro Ramos
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello, thanks for your reply!
Do you think that the residuals are too bad? This is 3d, i show you the plant of the grid. I'm obligued to use the LES-model... Only the continuity value is bad don t you think? |
|
January 11, 2013, 11:37 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
I wouldn't really trust a result if "just one" residual looks unusual. Can you localize the point of bad contiunity?
Could you post a picture of what happens during just a few timesteps. I can not really see something in the residual picture. I guess you did not change fluent's way of normalizing the residuals. You just use the default way, right?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
January 11, 2013, 11:43 |
|
#7 |
Member
Pedro Ramos
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 14 |
Ya... i'm new in CFD...
There is a problem wich concerns me... the velocities are too high in the initial section next to channel's bed. Like this contour of shear stress in the bed shows I defined the mass flow rate in the inlet with the flow (20 l/s). Thanks for your help! |
|
January 11, 2013, 11:51 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
I meant the residuals. Can you post a picture of the residuals where you can see just a few time steps? I want to see how each time step converges...
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
January 11, 2013, 11:56 |
|
#9 |
Member
Pedro Ramos
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 14 |
I'm sorry Like this: ?
|
|
January 11, 2013, 14:07 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
Great... Is each of the peaks the beginning of a new time step?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
January 11, 2013, 14:54 |
|
#11 |
Member
Pedro Ramos
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 14 |
No, sir... I think that each of the peaks represents one iteration. I defined 20 iterations for time-step...
Do you recommend any example or tutorial for the simulation of the turbulent flow around a body (cylinder)? Thank you, sir. |
|
January 11, 2013, 15:01 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
I don't think you are right. It looks like you have about 10 peaks each 100 iterations, thus 10 iterations per timestep. I guess you did not switch off the convergence critertion. Go to monitors -> residual monitor and set the convergence criterion to "none". You have the default case of "1.0e-3", which means that fluent will stop iterations each time-step, when all residuals are below 1.0e-3. If you switch that off and maybe increase the maxminum number of iterations per time step -> tadaaa.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
January 11, 2013, 16:41 |
|
#13 |
Member
Pedro Ramos
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you for your great advise!
The results improved and, in the other hand, the simulation is too slow now... but i'm patient I think it is possible improve the residuals. Do you know the meaning of "extrapolate variables?" |
|
January 14, 2013, 03:38 |
|
#14 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
Fluent Help says, that "extrapolate variables" uses a Taylor series expansion to estimate an initial guess for the next time step. If it is faster, I don't see any drawback...
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
benchmark: flow over a circular cylinder | goodegg | Main CFD Forum | 12 | January 22, 2013 12:47 |
1 Was FSI for a flow over a cylinder | vmlxb6 | CFX | 17 | May 16, 2011 03:29 |
reference calcultion, flow around a cylinder | butch85 | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 31, 2011 17:10 |
Flow over a flat plate & Flow over a cylinder | cfdxue | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 27, 2007 00:26 |
Flow over a cylinder | Anna | Main CFD Forum | 9 | March 24, 2006 15:32 |