|
[Sponsors] |
November 7, 2012, 11:29 |
Uplus vs Yplus
|
#1 |
Member
CC
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi all,
I want represent Uplus as a function of Yplus in Fluent. I simulated the simple case of water flow in a pipe. But, the representation of Uplus as a function of Yplus doesn't agree with literature. What I'm doing wrong? Regards |
|
November 7, 2012, 14:06 |
|
#2 |
Member
CC
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 15 |
I defined a Custom Field Function for Uplus and another for Yplus... Yplus I compared with the values of Ystar from Fluent and it is OK... For Uplus I used the expression: Uplus=|V|/(0.09^0.25*turb-kinetic-energy^0.5). As Yplus agree with the Ystar from fluent, the Uplus probably is not being well calculated, but I'm not sure about that.
I can calculate Yplus and Uplus for all domain or just for the points near the wall? I'm confused |
|
November 10, 2012, 05:33 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 17 |
hi bud,
a couple of things: 1) remember y+ is a log quantity, so make sure you are plotting on the correct axes ... 2) your first point looks like its at y+ = 5, so to see the laminar sub layer (if that is what you want in addition to the log region, you need to be calculating from Y+ = 1 at least ! cheers Jonathan edit: sorry, didnt see your last question - y+ / y* is only valid for wall adjacent cells ... |
|
November 14, 2012, 01:55 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
Quote:
y+ can be calculated for any cell. The y in y+ is taken to be the distance to the nearest wall. It is valid for even non wall-adjacent cells. Last edited by LuckyTran; November 14, 2012 at 04:52. |
||
November 14, 2012, 03:50 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
y+ is the normalized distance to the wall. That's why it can be calculated for every location in the domain. For some reason it is commonly accepted to call the y+ value of the wall adjacent cells just "y+".
|
|
November 14, 2012, 07:41 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 17 |
hi Lucky / Rod,
well, yes technically i suppose you guys might be right - i guess it depends how you define distance y. for example, in most CFD contexts, y is defined as the distance between the wall and the centroid / node of the wall adjacent cell, and you will get zero for interior cells. but in a contiuum context if you define y as a distance from the wall to some interior point, yplus is simply a non-dimensional distance from a surface. from the tone of the post, i thought it would easier to keep it simple, but i take your guys point ... cheers jonathan |
|
November 19, 2012, 09:53 |
|
#7 |
Member
CC
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 15 |
I'm using the stanrd wall function in the k-e turbulence model...
|
|
November 19, 2012, 10:00 |
|
#8 |
Member
CC
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 15 |
I changed the expression that I was used to calculate u+ and y+... u+=|V|/((tauW/rho)^(1/2)) in which tauW is the value of wall shear stress and now the representation is good
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
uplus values | C.C | FLUENT | 0 | October 31, 2012 07:45 |
Compressible yPlus and uPlus for LES | owayz | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | August 13, 2012 20:03 |
which yplus (SST) | sanchezz | CFX | 17 | January 11, 2010 05:45 |
Who stole my Yplus? | Chebeba | CFX | 4 | March 23, 2006 05:18 |
heat transfer coefficients with "bad" yplus | Andrew | Main CFD Forum | 4 | April 8, 1999 05:43 |