|
[Sponsors] |
UDF for inlet temperature and species concentration |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 7, 2018, 12:59 |
UDF for inlet temperature and species concentration
|
#1 |
New Member
Haidor
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello,
I modeling a room with multiple inlets and outlets. I want one of my inlets to have the same temperature and species concentration as one of my outlets. I tried the recirculation boundary condition in Fluent but it was causing a problem with species convergence. Can I do this using a UDF? Thank you. |
|
February 7, 2018, 13:05 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Haidor
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
Oh and I am simulating a steady state by the way. Thanks for your help!
|
|
February 8, 2018, 04:55 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,965
Rep Power: 27 |
Yes you can.
Code:
DEFINE_PROFILE(inlettemp,c,t,i) { face f; THREAD *outletthread; real A, area=0,sumtemp=0,temp; outletthread = get_thread(12541); /*here put the number of the outlet thread. */ /*And get_thread is the wrong function, find the correct one in help. */ BEGIN_F_LOOP(outletthread,f) { /*loop through faces of your outlet */ F_AREA(A,outletthread,f); /*make A the area of the face */ area += NV_MAG(A); sumtemp += F_T(f,outletthread); } END_F_LOOP(outletthread) temp=sumtemp/A; /* temp becomes the average temperature */ BEGIN_F_LOOP(c,t) { F_PROFILE(c,t)=temp; } END_F_LOOP(c,t); } |
|
February 8, 2018, 12:57 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Haidor
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
Great, thank you very much!
|
|
February 12, 2018, 13:55 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Haidory,
pakk's sketch is one good way. You will need to work through the code line by line to fix the syntax, so (as pakk mentioned) you only have the skeleton of a solution so far. Some hints: -- "A" needs to be declared as an array "A[ND_ND]" -- The correct function is "Lookup_Thread(domain, 1234);", so, before that you need "Domain *domain = Get_Domain(1);" -- Accumulate "sumtemp += F_T(f,outletthread) * NV_MAG(A);" -- Then outside the loop divide by area, not by A. -- "begin_f_loop(f,outletthread) { ... } end_f_loop(f,outletthread);" etc Then you need similar UDF for each species, except with F_YI(f,outletthread,i) for mass fraction of species i, instead of F_T(f,outletthread). I cannot think of a neat way to do each of the species except to copy-paste-edit a new profile UDF for each one. I'll suggest a different way in another post. Good luck! Ed |
|
February 12, 2018, 14:03 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 12 |
Oh, one more thing which might not be easy to pick out of the manual:
to make that UDF work in parallel, you need something like this, after the first face loop and before you calculate "temp": Code:
#if RP_NODE PRF_GRSUM1(area); PRF_GRSUM1(sumtemp); #endif |
|
February 12, 2018, 15:08 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 12 |
One alternative approach would be to venture into the murky world of Scheme programming in Fluent. This will be a longish post, because I'll work through the steps that I would go through for temperature. The end result is fairly concise but not easy to digest or debug:
First, find the TUI command that sets the boundary condition you want. (This is horribly, horribly model-dependent -- a major disadvantage of this approach.) So, for example, I have in front of me a model with a mass-flow-inlet called "inlet" and a pressure-outlet called "outlet". If I work through the TUI command "/define/boundary-condition/mass-flow-inlet", I see the following input/output: Code:
/define/boundary-conditions> mass-flow-inlet (inlet) zone id/name [inlet] inlet Reference Frame: Absolute [yes] Mass Flow Specification Method: Mass Flow Rate [yes] Use Profile for Mass Flow Rate? [no] Mass Flow Rate (kg/s) [3.598] Use Profile for Total Temperature? [no] Total Temperature (k) [300] 400 Use Profile for Supersonic/Initial Gauge Pressure? [no] Supersonic/Initial Gauge Pressure (pascal) [0] Direction Specification Method: Direction Vector [no] Direction Specification Method: Normal to Boundary [yes] Turbulent Specification Method: K and Epsilon [no] Turbulent Specification Method: Intensity and Length Scale [no] Turbulent Specification Method: Intensity and Viscosity Ratio [no] Turbulent Specification Method: Intensity and Hydraulic Diameter [yes] Turbulent Intensity (%) [5] Hydraulic Diameter (m) [0.508] Code:
/define/boundary-conditions/mass-flow-inlet inlet , , , , , 400 , , , , , , , , , , Check it again. Now, find a Scheme command that creates this text with a numeric input. Here is one: Code:
(format #f "/define/boundary-conditions/mass-flow-inlet inlet , , , , , ~16.8e , , , , , , , , , ," 395.1) Code:
(pick-a-real "/rep/surf/mwa (outlet) temp n") Combine those two functions to get the text command that you want: Code:
(format #f "/define/boundary-conditions/mass-flow-inlet inlet , , , , , ~16.8e , , , , , , , , , ," (pick-a-real "/rep/surf/mwa (outlet) temp n")) Code:
(ti-menu-load-string (format #f "/define/boundary-conditions/mass-flow-inlet inlet , , , , , ~16.8e , , , , , , , , , ," (pick-a-real "/rep/surf/mwa (outlet) temp n"))) While I'm here, I might as well mention that you can adjust the value, once you get your head round the brackets and Reverse-Polish syntax. For example, if your recirculated gas had a temperature loss on its way, you could reduce the temperature that reaches the inlet: Code:
(let ((temp_loss 5)) (ti-menu-load-string (format #f "/define/boundary-conditions/mass-flow-inlet inlet , , , , , ~16.8e , , , , , , , , , ," (- (pick-a-real "/rep/surf/mwa (outlet) temp n") temp_loss)))) Code:
(load "adjuster.scm") Finally, you can put that last command into Calculation Activities...Execute Commands, with an instruction to do the adjustment every 10 or 20 iterations. (And, finally, we reach a benefit of doing it by Scheme rather than by UDF.) ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; As another example, I've just turned on species with the carbon-monoxide-air template, and made "inlet" into a velocity-inlet. My TUI command is now something like this: Code:
/define/boundary-conditions/velocity-inlet inlet n n y y n 17 n 0 n 400 n n y 5 10 n n 0.15 n 0.03 n 0.01 n 0.02 ;;; species mass fractions in order o2, co2, co, h2o (and n2 is the rest) Fluent 18.0; 17 m/s specified as normal to the inlet; with temperature 400K; turbulence specified as intensity 5 and viscosity ratio 10; species specified as mass fractions in the order mentioned. If *any* of those details change *even slightly*, I would need to rejig the TUI command. But, if we're happy with that, here is a command to put into "adjuster-species.scm" (using "string-append" to make it slightly less brain-melting): Code:
(ti-menu-load-string (string-append "/define/boundary-conditions/velocity-inlet inlet n n y y n 17 n 0 n " (format #f " ~16.8e " (pick-a-real "/rep/surf/mwa (outlet) temp n")) " n n y 5 10 n " (format #f " n ~16.8e " (pick-a-real "/rep/surf/mwa (outlet) o2 n")) (format #f " n ~16.8e " (pick-a-real "/rep/surf/mwa (outlet) co2 n")) (format #f " n ~16.8e " (pick-a-real "/rep/surf/mwa (outlet) co n")) (format #f " n ~16.8e " (pick-a-real "/rep/surf/mwa (outlet) h2o n")))) Code:
/define/boundary-conditions/velocity-inlet (inlet) inlet n n y y n 17 n 0 n 3.33000000e+02 n n y 5 10 n n 0.00000000e+00 n 0.00000000e+00 n 0.00000000e+00 n 0.00000000e+00 #t Last edited by obscureed; February 12, 2018 at 15:17. Reason: Minor fix to make inlet speed 17 rather than 16. |
|
February 26, 2018, 07:51 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Haidor
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
Dear obscureed,
Thank you very much for taking the time to reply to my post. I am frankly not familiar with Scheme programming in Fluent, but I will try to follow you instructions step by step and hopefully I will get it right. Thanks again!! |
|
May 21, 2018, 04:41 |
|
#9 | |
New Member
Sergio
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
I used the code wrote by pakk and your tips and I could write the following UDF that does what the OP wanted (I had the same problem). Howerver, I only can run it in serial mode, If I include your additional lines to parallelize it, I got an error. Code:
/*********************************************************************** UDF for specifying steady-state parabolic pressure profile boundary profile for a turbine vane ************************************************************************/ #include "udf.h" DEFINE_PROFILE(species_profile, t, i) { /* Declare variables */ face_t f, c; Thread *outletthread; real A[ND_ND], area=0, sumspecie=0, specie; Domain *domain; domain = Get_Domain(1); /* Returns fluid domain pointer (1 = Mixture) */ outletthread = Lookup_Thread(domain, 12); /* Here put the number of the outlet thread. */ begin_f_loop(f, outletthread) { /* Loop through faces of your outlet */ F_AREA(A, f, outletthread); /* make A the the face vector */ area += NV_MAG(A); sumspecie += F_YI(f, outletthread, i) * NV_MAG(A); } end_f_loop(f, outletthread); #if RP_NODE PRF_GRSUM1(area); PRF_GRSUM1(sumspecie); #endif specie = sumspecie / area; /* specie becomes the average specie */ begin_f_loop(c, t) { F_PROFILE(c, t, i) = specie; } end_f_loop(c, t); } |
||
May 21, 2018, 05:13 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34 |
Ansys Fluent Customization manual
Chapter 7. Parallel Considerations best regards |
|
May 21, 2018, 06:28 |
|
#11 | |
New Member
Sergio
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...df/node218.htm I got the following error: mphost_to_node_int_1: no function prototype Is it possible to interpret these UDF or have to be compiled? |
||
May 22, 2018, 09:15 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi smb,
PRF_GRSUM1 is a global reduction macro, which is mentioned in the help files as incompatible with interpreted UDFs. But, to be honest, the number of limitations on an interpreted UDF is so large that I would never even consider using interpreted. Take a deep breath and install a compiler. (There are some useful posts on this -- for example: links to instructions Visual Studio 2017 for udf use - which modules do I need?; troubleshooting errors How to solve UDF compilation problems in Fluent.; the basic steps of compile/load/hook The UDF library you are trying to load (libudf) is not compiled for 3D on the current.) Good luck! Ed |
|
July 4, 2019, 20:02 |
The .c code works for recirculation inlet and outlet?
|
#13 | |
Member
João Lourenço
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 9 |
Dear Sergio and everyone,
I am trying to do a simulation using the re-circulation inlet and outlet boundary condition with multi-species. However, I am having some problems. The overall mass flow rate in the inlet and outlet has the some value (kg/s). But, when I see the amount of mass flow rate in each species, the result is different. If at the outlet of the system extracted 0.08 kg/s of O2, at the inlet of the system we should have the same amount of O2, that is 0.08 kg/s. But this is not happening. I am using Fluent 16.2 and I would like to know if this problem, when using multi-species, it is corrected in last versions. The above .c code works? I would like to know just to not lose time if doesn't work. Thank you for your attention. JBPLourenco Quote:
|
||
July 5, 2019, 01:08 |
|
#14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 164
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
|
||
July 9, 2019, 05:23 |
|
#15 | |
Member
João Lourenço
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
I am trying to understand how to do a UDF that computes the mass flow rate in each species and how to say that my inlet and outlet have the same value for each one. Do you know if the code proposed by smb works? How to do it for multi species? Thank you for your time. JPBLourenco |
||
July 10, 2019, 01:01 |
|
#16 |
Senior Member
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34 |
ansys fluent customization manual -> DEFINE_PROFILE macro
I recommend you to start with model without species best regards |
|
August 31, 2019, 21:21 |
|
#17 |
New Member
Hamza Latif Mehr
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi,
I've made a code similar to this that will change the inlet temperature with the specific cell ID's temperature. that is DEFINE_PROFILE(inlettemp,f,c,t,i) { real tavg real temp face_t f; real temper=0.0; real A[ND_ND]; real area= 0.0; int ID= 78 Thread*t; d= Get_Domain(1_; t= Lookup_Thread(d,ID); tavg=0.0; begin_f_loop(f,t) { F_AREA(A,f,t); area = NV_MAG(A)*2.0*M_PI; area_tot +=area; temper=F_T(f,t); tavg= temper*area; } end_f_loop(f,t) tavg/= area_tot; printf("Tavg= %g area_tot = %g\n", tavg, area_tot) if ((tavg>=305)) { temp=288; } if((tavg<305)) { temp=305; } BEGIN_F_LOOP(c,t) { F_PROFILE(c,t)=temp; } END_F_LOOP(c,t); } But it is not working correctly, i dont know why |
|
September 1, 2019, 04:49 |
|
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,965
Rep Power: 27 |
Please be more specific next time. "not working correctly" can mean so many different things:
Don't make us guess the problem, just tell the problem. Anyway, you forgot some semicolons at the end of some lines. |
|
September 1, 2019, 05:57 |
|
#19 |
New Member
Hamza Latif Mehr
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7 |
Dear Pakk,
Apologies for not specifying the problem, The problems are mainly compilation errors: 1-Semi colons , and i added them with undeclared variables which i did add. 2-it was giving undeclared variable for BEGIN_F_LOOP so i changed it to begin_f_loop and it fixed it. 3-and for line 39 F_PROFILE(c,t) it is giving parse error when i am interpreting it. The code is as follows: #include "udf.h" DEFINE_PROFILE(inlettemp,f,c,t,i) { Domain *d; real area_tot = 0.0; real tavg; real temp; face_t f; real temper=0; real A[ND_ND]; real area= 0; int ID= 1048; Thread*t; d= Get_Domain(1); t= Lookup_Thread(d,ID); tavg=0.0; begin_f_loop(f,t) { F_AREA(A,f,t); area = NV_MAG(A)*2.0*M_PI; area_tot +=area; temper=F_T(f,t); tavg= temper*area; } end_f_loop(f,t) tavg/= area_tot; printf("Tavg= %g area_tot = %g\n", tavg, area_tot); if ((tavg>=305)) { temp=288; } if((tavg<305)) { temp=305; } begin_f_loop(c,t) { F_PROFILE(c,t)=temp; } end_f_loop(c,t); } Help would be great as my thesis depends on it, thank you Best regards |
|
Tags |
inlet boundary condition, udf code |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF Species source makes my temperature drop... cold fire??? | therandomestname | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | November 26, 2015 12:12 |
Increasing temperature in species transport | ssamton | FLUENT | 2 | February 28, 2012 21:37 |
UDF species equations | louiza | FLUENT | 4 | March 10, 2010 02:20 |
Temperature discontinuity with Species Transport | Dominique | FLUENT | 0 | August 31, 2004 21:27 |
chemical reaction - decompostition | La S. Hyuck | CFX | 1 | May 23, 2001 01:07 |