|
[Sponsors] |
February 23, 2019, 09:31 |
A convergence problem help please
|
#1 |
New Member
Manel
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 7 |
Hello every body ;
I am new in Fluent , and i am modelizing a jet into a 2D cavity. I have found a problem to enter the operating conditions of the pressure and velocity with Fluent 19.2 Studient version : In Boundary conditions i have : Inlet Outlet Wall Surfacic corps My problem with pressure is : When i put the inlet pressure = 10000000 pa , and i switch to Outlet pressure in order to put 101325 pa ; i find that the value of the inlet is automatically put in outlet . I am enable to specify each zone by each pressure. My problem with velocity is : I am also enable to put outlet velocity as a boundary condition. It ies just noticed in inlet velocity. I am using a multiphase model with 2 phases : water and air. The viscosity model is : inviscid The initialization method is : Standard (compute from inlet) The solution method : Pressure velocity coupling Scheme : simple , spatial descitization : green gauss node descritization Pressure : Presto! , i have used also : body force weignted Momentum : Second order Volume fraction : Geo-Reconstruct Transient First formulation : first order implicit When i run calculation , fluent stop .It diplay a divergence error : Divergence detected in AMG solver: y-momentum Stabilizing pressure correction to enhance linear solver robustness. Error at host: floating point exception Error at Node 0: floating point exception Sincerely , i am enable to identify the origin of the error : may be the BC of velocity and pressure ? What do you think please ? Thanks you for your help |
|
February 25, 2019, 10:15 |
|
#2 |
Member
annan
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear Manel,
I am not sure I understand well your probleme, but are you trying to set both velocity AND pressure at the inlet AND the outlet ? Normally, I would recommand you to choose a velocity-inlet for the inlet and pressure-outlet for the outlet. Hope this will help Good luck Annan |
|
February 25, 2019, 11:26 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Manel
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi ,
Thanks you for your response Annan , I have set operating pressure inlet =10^7 pa V inlet =-1.5 m/s But my problem with Fluent 19.2 studient version is : When i want to set the operating pressure outlet (P=101325 pa) , i cannot , because when i do this , i find that pressure inlet has changed to P=101325 pa. Bu this way , the pressure gradient in my flow =0 . I don't know if this is the real problem or if the problem is related to mesh. What do you think ? Have a nice day |
|
February 26, 2019, 06:34 |
|
#4 |
Member
annan
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear Manel,
If I understood well, you choose velocity-inlet as boundary condition for your inlet. In this case, the pressure you specify is an Outflow Gauge pressure, which means that if your flow exits the domain at any boundary, then the pressure is equal to what you specify. Which makes sense with what happens to your calculation. You cannot specify the velocity AND the pressure at a boundary, if you want to specify the inlet pressure then you should choose Pressure-inlet as boundary condition. The usual set of boundary conditions is the following : - velocity-inlet at the inlet : you specify only the velocity magnitude or components - Pressure-outlet at the outlet : keep it at 0, which means that your flow goes to the atmosphere. By the way, the Gauge pressure is defined with respect to the operating pressure defined, the default value for the operating pressure is the atmospheric pressure, that is why you need to specify 0 and not 1atm at the outlet (Gauge pressure = P-P_operating_conditions = P-P_atm) The total pressure gradient is not going to be equal to zero, because you have an inlet velocity, which makes your dynamic pressure (0.5*rho*v^2) is not equal to zero. Another precision, what you specify at boundaries is Gauge pressure, and not Operating pressure. The operating pressure is defined in the Operating conditions panel. I hope this helps, do not hesitate if any of what I explained is not clear. Good luck, Annan |
|
February 26, 2019, 08:22 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Manel
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 7 |
Dear Annan ,
Thaks you very much.It is clear now for me. In another side , i guess that the mesh may be the cause. I will improve the mesh and adjust my pressure as you told me. I will tell you when i obtain the result. Have a nice day. Manel |
|
February 26, 2019, 10:56 |
|
#6 |
Member
annan
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear Manel,
You should check the mesh metrics (skewness, orthogonal quality ... etc.) and see if they are in a good quality range. Good luck Best regards, Annan |
|
February 28, 2019, 07:29 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Manel
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 7 |
Dear Hannan
Thanks you very much.You have helped me so much. Yours faithfully , Manel Souguir |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Convergence problem in Fluent for quenching process | kaeran | FLUENT | 4 | December 1, 2014 03:14 |
Rotate frame reference convergence problem! | wjy-c | CFX | 2 | September 26, 2014 07:03 |
Centrifugal pump OpenFOAM, convergence problem, ANSA model | RDD | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 5, 2014 10:12 |
Convergence Problem in Axisymmetric Periodic Flow | atheresia | FLUENT | 3 | February 10, 2014 04:00 |
Convergence of CFX field in FSI analysis | nasdak | CFX | 2 | June 29, 2009 02:17 |