|
[Sponsors] |
Number of particles based on mass flow rate in DPM |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 24, 2018, 02:37 |
Number of particles based on mass flow rate in DPM
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi everyone,
I am trying to simulate Al2O3-water nanofluid flow through a plane 2D channel using DPM. Mass flow rate of nanoparticle is 0.06498 kg/s. I am using surface injection where the number of particles are 60 as the number of cell faces are 60 according to my geometry. Nanoparticle diameter is 20 nm and density is 3880 kg/m3. So, each nanoparticle has a mass of 1.625*10^(-20) kg. So, for each injection 60 particles are entering into the domain which have a total mass of 9.75*10^(-19) kg. So, I am confused how fluent adjust the mass flow rate per second? If I increase the mass flow rate keeping the number of cells same at inlet, then how Fluent adjust it? I have searched in earlier forum. But not able to understand properly . Please help me Last edited by Saptarshi; April 24, 2018 at 06:38. |
|
May 24, 2018, 09:49 |
|
#2 |
New Member
BHUVANESH
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: INDIA
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
The injection is wrt timestep. The surface injection will be a parcel and not a particle. No of particles in single parcel = (total mass flowrate*time step)/(no of parcels*mass of a single particle) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Discrete Phase Model, outlet mass flow rate does not fit | edu_aero | FLUENT | 29 | February 3, 2020 09:38 |
DPMFoam - Serious Error --particle-laden flow in simple geometric config | benz25 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 27 | December 19, 2017 21:47 |
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes | thomasnwalshiii | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 18 | December 19, 2015 19:57 |
Cluster ID's not contiguous in compute-nodes domain. ??? | Shogan | FLUENT | 1 | May 28, 2014 16:03 |
Discrete Phase & Mass Flow Rate | MagnusZeus | FLUENT | 0 | December 2, 2011 18:57 |