CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT > Fluent Multiphase

DPM simulation-Restrictions on the mesh size to particle size ratio?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By vinerm

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 26, 2016, 13:37
Question DPM simulation-Restrictions on the mesh size to particle size ratio?
  #1
Senior Member
 
Ruiyan Chen
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Hangzhou, China
Posts: 162
Rep Power: 10
cryabroad is on a distinguished road
Hi guys,

I started to work on liquid-particle simulations (mainly DPM, the DDPM is not suitable for my case) couple weeks ago and as usual I read the User's Guide and some other materials online. However I was not able to find out if Fluent has restrictions on the mesh size when using DPM.

I went through a lot of research papers (some of them use different CFD softwares) and it seems like the mesh size has to be larger than the particle size. Some state that the ratio of mesh size to particle diameter has to be larger than 4.

I double checked the User's Guide but didn't find any statement about this. Any help is welcome!

Plus, if it turns out that the mesh size does have to be larger than the particle, how can I model a liquid-particle case where the particles are generally several times larger than the mesh?

Thank you very much.
cryabroad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2020, 23:33
Default
  #2
Member
 
Dnyanesh Mirikar
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 7
DnyanMiri is on a distinguished road
Hi Ruiyan,
Did you find the answer to your question? I would be interested in learning the answer.

Thanks
DnyanMiri is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2020, 10:06
Default Particle Size
  #3
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
vinerm will become famous soon enough
This information is given in user manual, though not explicitly. For the assumptions in DPM to be valid, particles cannot occupy more than 10-12% of the volume, locally as well as globally. That means, even the smallest cell size should have its volume at least 10 times the volume of largest particle size.
jamalf64 likes this.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2021, 12:43
Default
  #4
New Member
 
pig
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
pigpig is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
This information is given in user manual, though not explicitly. For the assumptions in DPM to be valid, particles cannot occupy more than 10-12% of the volume, locally as well as globally. That means, even the smallest cell size should have its volume at least 10 times the volume of largest particle size.
Hi,
The thickness of the first layer of the boundary layer must be greater than the particle size?
pigpig is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2022, 22:13
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Lube23
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Lube23 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
This information is given in the user manual, though not explicitly. For the assumptions in DPM to be valid, particles cannot occupy more than 10-12% of the volume, locally and globally. That means, even the smallest cell size should have its volume at least 10 times the volume of largest particle size.
Hello, but don't forget to consider that the volume fraction is:
number of particles * Volume of particle / Volume of cell

I found the following paper:

Coupled CFD-DEM Simulation of Seed Flow in an air Seeder Distributor Tube
Author: Leno Guzman, Ying Chen and Hubert Landry

Where a relation between the volume of the cell and the diameter of the particle is three times.
Lube23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 16, 2022, 02:51
Default
  #6
New Member
 
pig
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
pigpig is on a distinguished road
There is also literature that says that the grid is better calculated between 10-20dp of particles. This is a question that needs some thought
pigpig is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
mesh and fluent, multiphase flow, multiphase particle


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DPM particle tracking considering particle size oball Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 4 October 6, 2019 15:42
[ICEM] Effect of globle mesh size and mesh independency sujay ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 20 September 29, 2019 08:36
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 07:20
In DPM model, with rosin-rammler particle size distribution described problems, thank fa84a8g779 FLUENT 1 July 11, 2013 22:30
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 March 27, 2011 22:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:45.