|
[Sponsors] |
DPM simulation-Restrictions on the mesh size to particle size ratio? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 26, 2016, 13:37 |
DPM simulation-Restrictions on the mesh size to particle size ratio?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Ruiyan Chen
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Hangzhou, China
Posts: 162
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi guys,
I started to work on liquid-particle simulations (mainly DPM, the DDPM is not suitable for my case) couple weeks ago and as usual I read the User's Guide and some other materials online. However I was not able to find out if Fluent has restrictions on the mesh size when using DPM. I went through a lot of research papers (some of them use different CFD softwares) and it seems like the mesh size has to be larger than the particle size. Some state that the ratio of mesh size to particle diameter has to be larger than 4. I double checked the User's Guide but didn't find any statement about this. Any help is welcome! Plus, if it turns out that the mesh size does have to be larger than the particle, how can I model a liquid-particle case where the particles are generally several times larger than the mesh? Thank you very much. |
|
June 6, 2020, 23:33 |
|
#2 |
Member
Dnyanesh Mirikar
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi Ruiyan,
Did you find the answer to your question? I would be interested in learning the answer. Thanks |
|
June 7, 2020, 10:06 |
Particle Size
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
This information is given in user manual, though not explicitly. For the assumptions in DPM to be valid, particles cannot occupy more than 10-12% of the volume, locally as well as globally. That means, even the smallest cell size should have its volume at least 10 times the volume of largest particle size.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
December 30, 2021, 12:43 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
pig
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
The thickness of the first layer of the boundary layer must be greater than the particle size? |
||
June 15, 2022, 22:13 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Lube23
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
number of particles * Volume of particle / Volume of cell I found the following paper: Coupled CFD-DEM Simulation of Seed Flow in an air Seeder Distributor Tube Author: Leno Guzman, Ying Chen and Hubert Landry Where a relation between the volume of the cell and the diameter of the particle is three times. |
||
June 16, 2022, 02:51 |
|
#6 |
New Member
pig
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
There is also literature that says that the grid is better calculated between 10-20dp of particles. This is a question that needs some thought
|
|
Tags |
mesh and fluent, multiphase flow, multiphase particle |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DPM particle tracking considering particle size | oball | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 4 | October 6, 2019 15:42 |
[ICEM] Effect of globle mesh size and mesh independency | sujay | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 20 | September 29, 2019 08:36 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
In DPM model, with rosin-rammler particle size distribution described problems, thank | fa84a8g779 | FLUENT | 1 | July 11, 2013 22:30 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |