|
[Sponsors] |
February 11, 2010, 21:31 |
Memory Utilization with Flow-3D
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 17 |
All
noticed that by using SMP version the CPU utilization is high (without GMO option turn on) but memory utilization is always low at around 200MB-400MB. so I wonder why the program didn't fully utilize the memory size that my system have (32GB RAM) in order to provide additional speed up in simulation time?Thanks. |
|
February 25, 2010, 13:25 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
michael barkhudarov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sante Fe, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
|
||
March 1, 2010, 00:50 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 17 |
Michael
so can you advice what physic, solver setting & mesh size will allow full memory utilization? btw, should i expected simulation time speed up if the memory utilization is 100%? |
|
March 1, 2010, 12:22 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
michael barkhudarov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sante Fe, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
|
||
May 12, 2010, 04:17 |
re
|
#5 |
New Member
Seunghyun Yoon
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16 |
I don't think using more memory would speed up the simulation. memory is like a hard drive, a storage. Using 100% memory would mean you have 32 Gb for your computer to remember, which means your cpu would have more stuff to calculate.
If you use more cells (smaller cells), then your memory usage would go up, but the calculation time will be much longer I believe. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Flow meter Design | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 3 | June 21, 2011 09:33 |
What is the difference between liquid reactive flow and gas reactive flow? | James | Main CFD Forum | 6 | May 15, 2009 13:14 |
potential flow vs. Euler flow | curious ... | Main CFD Forum | 23 | July 21, 2006 08:40 |
Plug Flow | Franck | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 4, 2003 06:57 |