|
[Sponsors] |
January 8, 2009, 04:55 |
K-E vs RNG Turbulent MOdel
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
All Can any one advice which turbulent models (K-e vs RNG) is suitable to use for highly turbulent flow? and what is the pro and con's?
|
|
January 8, 2009, 19:05 |
Re: K-E vs RNG Turbulent MOdel
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
RNG k-e model is preferable. It better handles transitional flows and different turbulent length scales. The main difference from the standard k-e model is that some coefficients that are constants in the standard model are functions of the flow parameters in the RNG model.
Michael |
|
January 8, 2009, 22:56 |
Re: K-E vs RNG Turbulent MOdel
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Michael So is that mean RNG K-e is more stable turbulent model to use?
|
|
January 9, 2009, 01:18 |
Re: K-E vs RNG Turbulent MOdel
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
CK,
What do you mean by more stable? |
|
January 9, 2009, 03:59 |
Re: K-E vs RNG Turbulent MOdel
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Michael it is refer to free from convergence issue & produce correct results. so is RNG better than standard k-e turbulent model?
|
|
January 9, 2009, 11:48 |
Re: K-E vs RNG Turbulent MOdel
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, I think, the RNG model is better in that it better accounts for turbulence, but both models are equally stable.
|
|
January 11, 2009, 04:17 |
Re: K-E vs RNG Turbulent MOdel
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Michael Thanks for feedback.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RNG k-epsilon model implementation | romant | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | June 20, 2018 09:33 |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |
contradicting results of different turbulent model | dani | FLUENT | 0 | July 6, 2004 03:07 |
how to model transition laminar to turbulent? | james | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 1, 2003 04:16 |