CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM

FloTHERM: How to convert the cylindrical geometry to Cylinder SmartPart?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Gabriel_C

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 23, 2016, 10:10
Default FloTHERM: How to convert the cylindrical geometry to Cylinder SmartPart?
  #1
New Member
 
Oleg
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 10
olsmir is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I have imported the STEP file into FloTHERM.Bridge (see attached). This file represents cylindrical geometry. I need to convert it to Cylinder SmartPart.

Decompose and Dissect Body commands cannot do it: they generate the "Overcomplex cannot dissect" message.

Single Object command (and selecting Bounding Cylinder in its dialog) generates cylinder according to the bounding box of the part, but surprisingly this bounding box is wider than the part, so the resulting cylinder has the wrong size.

Finally I have attempted to simplify the part with Global Simplify and Local Simplify commands, but without any success.

Would anybody give me advice how to correctly convert the cylindrical part into Cylinder SmartPart?
Attached Files
File Type: zip geometry.zip (175.9 KB, 7 views)
olsmir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2016, 02:52
Wink
  #2
Member
 
Gabriel Ciobanu
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 15
Gabriel_C is on a distinguished road
Hello Oleg,

- first of all the step file provided by you is full of errors (see attached picture) and that's why the decompose, dissect features do not work.
- second is that the geometry is indeed very complex and no way suited for "classic" flotherm simulations. You could try instead flotherm XT or other software.
- third, to return to your question: yes it's possible to import such complex geometry into flotherm (see my second picture) but that led to the creation of more than 3500 cuboids!!! "just because you can doesn't mean you should"


Since you had another topic, I'm curious what's the purpose of learning flotherm. You want to do a specific simulation/project/ work related task or you do it for fun?
If your simulation is focusing in heat flow inside cylinders, holes and such complex geometry than you should change the tool. Flotherm is good ("probably the best ..." ) at simulating electronics (PCB's, IC's, enclosures...etc) and not heat caused by friction of a screw in a hole .

BR, Gabriel
Attached Images
File Type: jpg error_in_geometry.jpg (87.0 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg flotherm_screw.jpg (30.6 KB, 16 views)
Gabriel_C is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2016, 02:57
Default
  #3
Member
 
Gabriel Ciobanu
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 15
Gabriel_C is on a distinguished road
...or you could always create a cylinder (max of 64 facets) directly in the project tree with your desired dimensions...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cyl_creation.jpg (71.6 KB, 14 views)
olsmir likes this.
Gabriel_C is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2016, 04:24
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Oleg
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 10
olsmir is on a distinguished road
Thank you, Gabriel, for clarification. Sorry that my question was incorrect. Of course, I had in mind the conversion of complex sylindric geometry to the pure cylinder. You explained me that it would be much easier to create it in Project Manager than to use a lot of commands provided in floMCAD.bridge. I tried to work out some "universal algorithm" to convert any construction to floTHERM, without resorting to manually creating the geometry in floTHERM. So I was wrong with such algorithm.

As for the purpose of learning floTHERM, a have a container with a power supply, complex PCB inside (imported to floTHERM from ExpeditionPCB) and other elements. So I am going to simulate what floTHERM was designed for. My initial questions were on the mechanical construction only and how floMCAD.bridge could deal with it.

Thank you for clarification,
Oleg
olsmir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2016, 10:08
Default
  #5
Member
 
Gabriel Ciobanu
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 15
Gabriel_C is on a distinguished road
Hello Oleg,

hmmmm... "complex PCB inside". That's like my bred and butter nowadays . You could drop an eye on this article that explains different PCB and components modeling fundamentals in classic flotherm:
http://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/72...bd-sept2016/54

Hope it helps.

Best regards, Gabriel
Gabriel_C is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solver and geometry choose for drag coefficient calculation around circular cylinder at large Re lin OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 April 16, 2009 11:50
Porous Media in Cylindrical Geometry Danny B FLUENT 3 September 12, 2008 20:23
vitual _ real deneb FLUENT 3 January 22, 2007 05:31
Cylindrical grid around rudder geometry Karan Main CFD Forum 0 March 20, 2002 14:48
Virtual/Real geometry. Jack Keays FLUENT 9 June 16, 2000 00:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:36.