|
[Sponsors] |
January 11, 2018, 05:04 |
value of turbulent intensity at inlet
|
#1 |
New Member
abdul
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 |
How the NUMECA take care of turbulent intensity at the inlet for different turbulent models in Fine/Turbo. I need to know its default value for SA turbulent model. A reply is appreciated please
|
|
January 11, 2018, 05:46 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Holger Dietrich
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear eng.abdul,
the turbulent intensity at the inlet can be defined for the following turbulence models: -ke -kw -SST -v²f The SA model works with the kinematic turbulent viscosity [µt] as input parameter. I think it is possible to calculate the Turbulent Intensity based on the turbulent viscosity with equations mentioned in the theoretical manual (at the very bottom of the page, equation 3 (equation 1 as attachment)) FINE™/Turbo > User Guide > Flow Model > Turbulent Navier-Stokes > Best Practice for Turbulence Modelling > Defining Initial & Boundary Conditions With this equation you can estimate k at the inlet on basis of µt/µ, Ny und Cµ (which is 0.09 in SA model). With k, you can rearrange equation 2, which yields the streamwise fluctuating velocity u'². Finally, you can use the attached equation 3 to compute the related turbulent intensity Tu. I hope this works and yields reasonable values for Tu. Kind regards, Holger |
|
January 11, 2018, 09:45 |
|
#3 |
New Member
abdul
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 |
Thank you very much Mr Holger for prompt response.
1-Are these three equations valid for SA model? because in the manual these are expressed for k-ε, k-ω, EARSM and v²-f Models.? 2-Does Numeca considers 5% turbulent intensity for one equation SA Model? |
|
January 11, 2018, 18:40 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Holger Dietrich
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear abdul,
indeed you are right, these equations are only mentioned in context of the other turbulence models and not for SA model, I am not sure if they can be used for the SA model. Secondly, the constant Cµ doesn't exist in the SA model, as I claimed in my last post. Unfortunately, I did not find any clue in the manuals which value of turbulent intensity is assumed at the inlet for SA model. It seems to me only the kinematic turbulent viscosity is necessary as turbulent quantity at the inlet when using the SA model. Sorry that I can't provide a more helpful answer at the moment. |
|
January 12, 2018, 08:04 |
|
#5 |
New Member
abdul
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 |
thank you very much for your replies ... much appreciated..... One last question please .... can you tell me what is the suggested value of kinematic turbulent viscosity by the user manual . what is your comment
|
|
January 12, 2018, 08:30 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Holger Dietrich
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
for internal flows (like turbomachinery) a ratio of µt / µ = 1 to 5 is reasonable. From my experience (mainly turbomachinery applications) the default value of µt gives good results in comparison with experimental data. For external flows a ratio of 1 is recommended. You can also use the expert parameter NUTFRE to define define the initial value of the turbulent viscosity in the entire flow field. Kind regards Holger |
|
January 18, 2018, 13:36 |
|
#7 |
New Member
abdul
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 |
Thank you Holger!!
The default value at the inlet in boundary condition is νt=0.0001 m2/s, and the initial value of turbulent viscosity by the expert parameter NUTFRE is 0.0003... How these two values correspond to the ratio of νt / ν = 1 to 5 for internal flow. I mean what will be the ratio of νt / ν for turbulent viscosity of 0.0001 m2/s at the inlet and NUTFRE of 0.0003. I think the kinematic viscosity ν, needs to be calculated for a particular case. what is your take Last edited by eng.abdul; January 18, 2018 at 15:14. |
|
January 18, 2018, 18:00 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Holger Dietrich
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear abdul,
µt is defined at the inlet. The resulting ratio µt/µ (which should be between 1 and 5, as discussed) depends on the fluid properties. To be more precise it depends on the viscosity of the fluid. In FINE/Turbo you can model different fluids (for example Air Perfect Gas, Real Gas) with different laws for computing the viscosity. For Air Perfect Gas the Sutherland-Law is used to compute the viscosity on basis of the temperature. If you know the temperature at the inlet (or at a certain location in general) you can calculate the viscosity of the fluid at this location and then compute the ratio µt/µ. I hope this answers your question? If not please don't hesitate to ask. |
|
January 19, 2018, 13:29 |
|
#9 |
New Member
abdul
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 |
Thank you
But if I know the dynamic viscosity and density of a fluid then i think it is easy because v is ratio of dynamic viscosity and density. But by the sutherland law (rather than constant viscosity) with the temperature at the inlet gives more accurate value of vt/v.... thank you Regards |
|
January 31, 2018, 14:47 |
|
#10 |
New Member
abdul
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 |
Holger
I know the temperature at the inlet for a gas . how to determine the constants used in Sutherland's viscosity equation for a gas . the literature mention these constants only for air. https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Sutherland's_law |
|
January 31, 2018, 15:14 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Holger Dietrich
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi there,
May I ask which fluid you are going to model? I found some definitions following the links in this old thread: Sutherland's law coefficient for viscosity D.Cook's link shows some constants for different gases. Kind regards, Holger |
|
February 1, 2018, 04:09 |
|
#12 |
New Member
abdul
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 |
well i am talking about the real gas made of combustion products...gamma=Cp/Cv=1.33 .... i think the constants for air can be used for this....but dynamic viscosity is certainly different than the air at elevated temperatures
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
turbulent intensity for heat exchangers | soheil1991 | FLUENT | 1 | January 5, 2018 06:10 |
inlet for turbulent boundary layer | treer | FLUENT | 0 | February 12, 2012 01:54 |
Inlet Turbulence Intensity | aras | FLUENT | 0 | June 13, 2011 11:21 |
Turbulent intensity for pressure Outlet Boundary condition | Mohsin | FLUENT | 1 | April 30, 2010 11:36 |
Turbulent intensity | swe704 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 13, 2009 04:42 |