CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > CONVERGE

Tumble in converge

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By MFGT
  • 1 Post By MFGT

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 11, 2017, 00:03
Default Tumble in converge
  #1
New Member
 
prabhat
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 9
PRJHA is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I am trying to see effect on Tumble for closed cycle combustion simulation.
Does Converge provide any parameter to change tumble inside cylinder.
Where can I find explanation of that?

Thank you
Prabhat
PRJHA is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2017, 17:40
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Tobias
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 295
Rep Power: 11
MFGT is on a distinguished road
Hi Prabhat,

Tumble definition is explained in the output file reference, chapter 22, for dynamic.out file. The tumble ratio in x or y direction is defined as the ratio of the angular speed of the flowabout the center of mass in the x or y direction, omega_1 or omega_2 to the angular speed of the crankshaft, omega_crankshaft, as shown in Equation 22.3 of the latest release in the Theory Manuel.

There you have the definition, however its not exactly clear what you want to do? What do you mean by "change tumble inside cylinder"? Its affected by the geometry shape mainly and valve lift i would say. Are we talking about GDI/PFI?

Tobias
PRJHA likes this.
MFGT is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2017, 17:51
Default
  #3
New Member
 
prabhat
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 9
PRJHA is on a distinguished road
Hello MGFT,
Thank you for your reply.
I am not simulating intake valve lift profile. I am only simulating for closed cycle. I want to include proper value of tumble inside the cylinder due to affect of geometry effect.

Thank you
Prabhat
PRJHA is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2017, 17:54
Default
  #4
New Member
 
prabhat
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 9
PRJHA is on a distinguished road
and I am simulating both cases GDI and PFI.
PRJHA is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2017, 18:05
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Tobias
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 295
Rep Power: 11
MFGT is on a distinguished road
Sorry, i still dont get it.
Does your simulation includes the gas exchange (i assume so, otherwise PFI wouldn't work). Then there is nothing you have to do, there is no need to initialize a tumble as it results from the gas exchange. I prefer running from BDC -540 to BDC +180 for a complete cycle.

If you want to increase your tumble you would need to change the port geometry.
MFGT is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2017, 18:19
Default
  #6
New Member
 
prabhat
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 9
PRJHA is on a distinguished road
Hello Tobias,

Thank you again for your reply.
I will try to explain in better way this time
I am doing sector mesh for dual fuel with port injection of gasoline and direct injection of diesel.
So my mesh just include piston, head and liner. It doesn't include valve.
I am only able to do from IVC to EVO due to limitation of computational resources. I wish i can do full cycle simulation for complete engine geometry.
With IVC to EVO simulation is there any parameter i can change to affect my tumble ratio inside my cylinder.
I hope i am clear this time.
and thank you again for taking time to answer my post.

Best Regards
Prabhat
PRJHA is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2017, 18:48
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Tobias
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 295
Rep Power: 11
MFGT is on a distinguished road
Okay, so you got premixed gasoline (ic8h18?) and inject diesel, and all as an engine sector with just 3 boundaries.

In these kind of cases, its usually only swirl that can be initialized with initialize.in.
However, in your case i would propably try to go for a full geometry. You could simulate from IVO to IVC only and map the file to you sector geometry.
When mapping, you could modify (scale) charge motion related parameters like velocity and tke. Have a look at the example cases for mesh settings. You might also get away with running a bit coarser.

What are your CPU resources?
PRJHA likes this.
MFGT is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2017, 18:51
Default
  #8
New Member
 
prabhat
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 9
PRJHA is on a distinguished road
Thank you , I will try to do that.
PRJHA is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
converge cfd


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone has done Tumble ratio report in Star ccm? shaoyikai813 STAR-CCM+ 4 March 30, 2020 08:35
Tumble Direction from kri321shna CONVERGE 3 July 14, 2016 08:24
k and epsilon were hard to converge in multiphase model of Fluent Yanlong Li ANSYS 0 January 2, 2013 06:25
HELP !In relaxtion factor converge is taken or not MANOJ KUMAR FLUENT 5 September 22, 2005 05:16
Converge problem for multiphase flow Jen FLUENT 4 July 20, 2005 17:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:47.