|
[Sponsors] |
May 29, 2017, 08:56 |
Free Convection with Open Boundary?
|
#1 |
New Member
Tina Maake
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello,
I am modelling a geothermal pipe. For computational reasons I can not Modell the whole 4000 m borehole. So I restricted the are for 400 m. I want to take a closer look at the free convection, but I am confused what BC for the upper und the downer part may be the correct one. Open Boundary? Inlet/outlet? Or Close the pipe? At former modelling approaches the convection cells exceeded 400m. (This is for my master Thesis and I am using comsol multiphysics) Best regards, Tina Maake |
|
May 29, 2017, 23:41 |
open's stress free
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Svetlana Tkachenko
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 416
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello, I am not familiar with COMSOL, but my novice view is as follows.
- Do not close the pipe, it is like putting a wall. - Do not use outlet, it requires pressure or velocity (unless zero average static pressure suits you well). - I would suggest open boundary, it is a stress free boundary condition. - It is discussed here and there for example. |
|
Tags |
boundary condition, comsol, free convection, geothermal, heat transfer |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[swak4Foam] funkyDoCalc with OF2.3 massflow | NiFl | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 14 | November 25, 2020 04:30 |
what is swap4foam ?? | AB08 | OpenFOAM | 28 | February 2, 2016 02:22 |
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem | Sanyo | CFX | 17 | August 15, 2015 07:20 |
Radiation interface | hinca | CFX | 15 | January 26, 2014 18:11 |
OpenFOAM 1.6.x - CentOS 5.3 x86_64 | linnemann | OpenFOAM Installation | 68 | April 22, 2013 12:03 |