|
[Sponsors] |
December 6, 2010, 04:34 |
Viscous work term query
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 739
Rep Power: 26 |
Hi,
For the total energy equation there's a check box to include the work due to viscous stresses term in the energy equation. Why is it that by default this term is omitted from the energy equation and requires being separately activated? What sort of simulations require the total energy equation but not the viscous work term (it's not a Euler situation)? Would it not be better to solve the whole equation by default? My simulation (Mach no. 0.85, Re no. 5x10^6) shows a 20 deg C higher surface temperature (on average) with the viscous work term included (see image). Thanks Last edited by siw; December 6, 2010 at 07:14. Reason: Added image |
|
December 6, 2010, 07:41 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Viscous work is insignificant for most compressible flow models. Looks like you have found one where it is not. There is no point adding extra terms in the equation when they do not do anything for most models.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VISCOUS DISSIPATION | ROBERT | Main CFD Forum | 30 | May 29, 2019 05:21 |
question about term representation | titio | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | May 4, 2009 10:17 |
What is the Boussinesq Term in Momentum Equation | CFDtoy | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 11, 2008 10:56 |
UDF's - linearizing a negative source term | Steve Howell | FLUENT | 1 | March 18, 2001 17:21 |
Why FVM for high-Re flows? | Zhong Lei | Main CFD Forum | 23 | May 14, 1999 14:22 |