|
[Sponsors] |
August 24, 2022, 17:04 |
Transient Simulation - Convergence
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4 |
Hello,
I am currently running a transient simulation. Between the exit of the flow from domain 1 to domain 2 I used the profile transformation. In the menu "solver control" I have set the convergence criterion of type RMS with 10^-4 and maximum 5 "Coeff. Loops" (see screenshot 1) In the menu "Transient Blade Models" I have set 1200 "timesteps/period" and 2 "periods per run". (see screenshot 2) My simulation keeps calculating even after timestep 2400. In another attempt, I ran the simulation to over 3000 timesteps. Am I misunderstanding something or should my simulation be done after 2400 time steps? I am also confused by the plots in the Solver Manager. The plots shown in screenshot 3 are from the .res file after I stopped the simulation. Does my simulation not reach convergence or how should I interpret these plots? I don't know what to do and hope you can help me! Thank you! Greetings Christian |
|
August 24, 2022, 18:51 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,873
Rep Power: 33 |
Would you mind posting the diagnostics at the beginning of any of your time steps? from the header TIME STEP ...
Never seen that. May I ask why are you using 1200/period? is it not overkill? What kind of signal are you expecting? I cannot imagine you can capture the "steady-periodic" flow in two periods. What kind of precalculations have you done to come up with such a timestep?
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
August 25, 2022, 02:45 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4 |
Thanks for the answer!
Attached is a screenshot of the header of the first timestep. Excuse me, but I am still quite new in this area. What do the values in "timesteps/period" and "periods per run" mean exactly? Maybe I misunderstood something and caused the overkill. My thought process behind the 1200/period was as follows. So that stator and rotor are about the same size, in my case 12 rotor segments and 1 stator segment are necessary. (for profile transformation) 1200/12 is 100, so I can analyze the behavior of one rotor segment in 100 time steps. The prevailing flow has some vortex structures and I thought this would be a suitable value. |
|
August 25, 2022, 08:49 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,873
Rep Power: 33 |
Quote:
A factor of 10, means 120 timesteps/period. You also used an expression for the period; hence, not possible to know how you based your period calculation. I guess you mixed period of 1 revolution with the period of interest. In general you want to timestep not to move more than the smaller pitch the smallest face in the domain interface will move. You can then reduce it from there.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
||
August 25, 2022, 14:19 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4 |
Quote:
I will take a closer look again. Assuming I use 120 timesteps per period, what effect does the value of "periods per run" have on the simulation? For example I use 10 periods per run (reasonable value?), then my simulation should be finished after 1200 timesteps. Thanks! |
||
Tags |
convergence, interpretation, transient simulation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
interFoam Simulation speed and convergence graph | caganini | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 12, 2022 04:34 |
Convergence in Transient; Divergence in Steady State | artkingjw | FLUENT | 6 | May 24, 2018 03:51 |
Convergence in steady state simulations vs transient ones | cardioCFD | CFX | 5 | January 21, 2018 11:59 |
restarting paused transient simulation using reactingFoam | JMDag2004 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | August 10, 2015 11:15 |
how to identify transient simulation converged | littlelz | CFX | 5 | January 27, 2009 19:13 |