|
[Sponsors] |
February 20, 2021, 05:57 |
Yplus value too low for my simulations
|
#1 |
New Member
DhyaniBaba
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 7 |
I have been simulating a flow over turbine blade us K-omega automatic wall functions. I ended up choosing a very small value of the first element offset. Now, I am getting a Yplus <0.25 over the entire blade.
I read in the CFX manual that the automatic wall functions takes care if the mesh nodes are created inside the viscous sub-layer during mesh refinement. My all subsequent simulations are based on this. I wanted to know if my results will be reliable? Could there be any justification for having Yplus <0.25? |
|
February 20, 2021, 06:14 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
You are correct in theory that the automatic wall functions can handle any reasonable value of y+. But in practice if your y+ gets too small then round off errors cause problems, so it is possible to go too small. In my experience the threshold of round off error problems is not much below y+=1. Round off errors will cause convergence difficulties.
If you can remesh using y+=1.0 and rerun it this will tell you whether you need a mesh as fine as y+<0.25. Many simulations don't need a mesh that fine.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
Tags |
automatic wall treatment, k-omega model, y plus ranges, y plus selection |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
yPlus calculation:Fatal Error saying turbulence model not found | atul1018 | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 6 | November 23, 2022 08:55 |
yPlus NACA 0012 Airfoil | badwalgurpreet | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 8, 2019 02:35 |
YPlus and Aspect Ratios | NeroBlade | Pointwise & Gridgen | 2 | November 1, 2016 17:56 |
Calculation of yPlus in MRF simulations | MatejAndrej | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 1 | April 28, 2015 13:01 |
Hardware selection for steady/unsteady incompressible, turbulent and cht simulations | maddalena | OpenFOAM | 2 | July 13, 2011 09:55 |