CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Time and space of simulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree11Likes
  • 1 Post By karachun
  • 3 Post By Gert-Jan
  • 3 Post By Opaque
  • 1 Post By aero_head
  • 1 Post By aero_head
  • 1 Post By aero_head
  • 1 Post By Gert-Jan

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 5, 2021, 03:45
Default Time and space of simulation
  #1
Member
 
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 5
Knowledge is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone!

I am simulating a model, and is only interested in the heat transfer behavior. I need to do a lot of simulations and due to limited time and space on my computer I was wondering if it was possible to reduce the computational calculations as I am only interested in the heat transfer.

Thank you much
Knowledge is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2021, 06:15
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
karachun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 11
karachun is on a distinguished road
Replace Fluid domains with convection BC.
Knowledge likes this.
karachun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2021, 07:29
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,885
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
You can freeze the fluids and turbulence by setting expert parameters:

solve fluids = f
solve turbulence = f

Then CFX only solves the remaining equations, like energy.
In this way, you can solve a temperature field in a frozen flow field with various boundary conditions. This is of course only valid if the coupling between energy and fluids is negligible.
granzer, aero_head and Knowledge like this.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2021, 08:58
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,850
Rep Power: 33
Opaque will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gert-Jan View Post
You can freeze the fluids and turbulence by setting expert parameters:

solve fluids = f
solve turbulence = f

Then CFX only solves the remaining equations, like energy.
In this way, you can solve a temperature field in a frozen flow field with various boundary conditions. This is of course only valid if the coupling between energy and fluids is negligible.
and, the flow field was properly converged in the previous calculation. If there is a mass imbalance in the frozen field, it would show up in the heat transfer calculation. The negligible coupling also implies minimal temperature dependency (better none) of properties required for the flow: viscosity and density
granzer, aero_head and Knowledge like this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2021, 16:24
Default
  #5
Member
 
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 5
Knowledge is on a distinguished road
Hi

I am not expert in CFX and therefor as the manual recommend I should not change the expert control parameters if I am not experienced. Would you mind giving me a step by step description on how to change these parameters?
Knowledge is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2021, 16:38
Default
  #6
Member
 
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 5
Knowledge is on a distinguished road
I was wondering if it was possible to do it that way.

CFX-pre --> "output control" --> "Resuls" --> for "option" --> selected variables for "output variable list" --> temperature

Is it possible?
Knowledge is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2021, 17:13
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Kira
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 8
aero_head is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowledge View Post
Hi

I am not expert in CFX and therefor as the manual recommend I should not change the expert control parameters if I am not experienced. Would you mind giving me a step by step description on how to change these parameters?
Hello Sara,

To change the expert parameters, right click on the Solver folder and choose "Insert>Expert Parameter". Most of the parameters will appear in the GUI panel that comes up. If you need one that doesn't come up (i.e. an undocumented one), just add any of the ones shown to create the Expert Parameter object then right click on it and choose "Edit in Command Editor" to insert the parameter manually.
Knowledge likes this.
aero_head is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2021, 17:15
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Kira
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 8
aero_head is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowledge View Post
I was wondering if it was possible to do it that way.

CFX-pre --> "output control" --> "Resuls" --> for "option" --> selected variables for "output variable list" --> temperature

Is it possible?
Sure, it is possible but defeats the purpose of your question, since this would not reduce the number of computational calculations. Monitor points just monitor specified parameters, it would still calculate everything else as normal.
Knowledge likes this.
aero_head is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 7, 2021, 06:08
Default
  #9
Member
 
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 5
Knowledge is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by aero_head View Post
Sure, it is possible but defeats the purpose of your question, since this would not reduce the number of computational calculations. Monitor points just monitor specified parameters, it would still calculate everything else as normal.
But what is the difference between monitoring and calculation?
Can the monitoring option not reduce the simulation time my simulation takes approximatly a whole day right now and takes a lot of space on my harddisk
Knowledge is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 8, 2021, 12:22
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Kira
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 8
aero_head is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowledge View Post
But what is the difference between monitoring and calculation?
Can the monitoring option not reduce the simulation time my simulation takes approximatly a whole day right now and takes a lot of space on my harddisk
Monitoring a value lets you keep track of the parameter during the simulation. The calculation of everything else will continue as normal. Again, the only way to solely calculate certain parameters is to modify the T/F statements in the expert parameters.

You can try it out I know you said you are not an expert, but it is okay, because you are AWARE of what you will be modifying. They put that sentence in the manual because they don't want people changing expert parameters without knowing the repercussions. Since you now know what changing these settings will do, you are an 'expert' for that particular section

The only other way I can think of to only calculate certain parameters is to write and implement your own code, specifying what you want the solver to calculate (I've only done this once).
Knowledge likes this.
aero_head is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 8, 2021, 17:49
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,885
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
As I mentioned earlier, in a frozen flow field, you can solve the energy equation solely by setting the other equations to false. Then since you only solve an energy equation that is not coupled to anything, you can simply increase the auto time scale from 1 to 10, 10000, 100000, or what so ever. Just give it a try untill you pushed it too far. Then the solver solves the equation at very high speed for you in a short period of time. You only need to make absolutely sure that:

- your energy residuals are low
- the temperature in your monitoring points are constant.
- your energy imbalance is zero (energy in = energy out).

Then you can be sure that your energy equation is solved accurately. And again, remember your flow is frozen, so your solution only makes sense if there is no coupling between energy and any other variables. If you have an ideal gas, then you are already in trouble. Same hold for an temperature dependent viscosity. But judge for yourself.

Don't hesitate to use expert parameters. You are already an expert since you are suspicious on the action that you take. Credits for you.
aero_head likes this.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
heat transfer, reduce, space, time


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LES Setting up Sensors on Model: Do I Need the Time Averaged or Also Space Averaged D kepler123 Main CFD Forum 8 February 7, 2020 18:31
higher order time and space discretisation for elliptic eq. with a transport eq. emjay Main CFD Forum 1 August 20, 2019 16:50
Run OpenFoam in 2 nodes of a cluster WhiteW OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 16 December 20, 2016 00:51
Richardson Extrapolation to check time and space convergence Hooman Main CFD Forum 0 December 29, 2010 08:19
Time and Space Derivatives. beezee99 FLUENT 0 August 19, 2010 01:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:36.