|
[Sponsors] |
November 24, 2006, 18:31 |
Size of rotating domain
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am simulating a rotating turbine in a wind tunnel. The values of measured rotational velocity and torque are my reference. I set the problem as a rotating domain (turbine) inside a stationary domain (wind tunnel). The calculated values are affected by choosing rotating domain size. I choose it 1*Diameter of the rotor, 1.5 Diameter and 3*Diameter. For 1Diameter and 1.5 Diameter case the value of calculated torque on turbine blades is over predicted compared with experiment. While in the 3rd case (3*Diameter) the value is under predicted. What should I do? What is the correct domain size?
Other interesting phenomena that initial position of the blades affect the torque value. The value of the torque is changed when I draw the blades as vertical or horizontal. As the domain is rotating torque should not be affected by the initial position. Is this correct? |
|
November 26, 2006, 17:25 |
Re: Size of rotating domain
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
The best way to model it is to model exactly what you are trying to match. This means you should model the wind tunnel geometry, preferably with the upstream components as well. Glenn Horrocks |
|
November 27, 2006, 13:10 |
Re: Size of rotating domain
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This is interesting!!!
I would assume your 1*Diameter domain is set the Rotor-Stator interface right at the outer diamter of the rotor. This may be too close to the wake of the blade. But where is suitable to set the interface is an art. If everything is axisymmetrical, the initial position should not affect the overall parameters. In your case, it is really strange. Is the torque reading measured very stable? |
|
November 27, 2006, 13:18 |
Re: Size of rotating domain
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The torque reading in experiment is unstable. The difference between the 1.5 * Diameter and 3*Diameter case torque is too big. I made an interpolation between the 3 results. I found that the size of the domain should be 1/2 tunnel size. I am trying this now I hope I am right.
Adam |
|
November 28, 2006, 11:28 |
Re: Size of rotating domain
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So, the flow in the whole wind tunel is not exactly axisymmetric. That may explain for your different position getting different torque.
It is strange for the 1.5 and 3 diameter difference. Is this caused by CFX GGI interface interpolation? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX domain comparison | Kiat110616 | CFX | 4 | April 3, 2011 23:43 |
critical error during installation of openfoam | Fabio88 | OpenFOAM Installation | 21 | June 2, 2010 04:01 |
Domain size limit for external flows | chinc | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 15, 2010 21:58 |
Single Rotating Domain | Sans | CFX | 3 | October 26, 2007 03:33 |
Diverging wall scale due to large domain size | Kevin | CFX | 3 | November 12, 2006 16:48 |