|
[Sponsors] |
Temperature variation at adiabatic wall region |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 30, 2020, 20:04 |
Temperature variation at adiabatic wall region
|
#1 |
Member
William
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi All,
I'm doing two-fluid, conjugated heat transfer simulation. The whole domain is shown in figure 1. Hot fluid is CO2, cold is water. Boundary conditions are below: CO2 - Ref Pressure = 7.9MPa - inlet mass flow - inlet T = 70℃ - outlet relative P = 0 Water - Ref Pressure = 210kPa - inlet mass flow - inlet T = 35℃ - outlet relative P = 0 Turbulence model is k-e, heat transfer model is Total Energy win Ind. Viscous Work Term, and disabled Constant Physics to use two-fluid. Fig 2. shows heat transfer at plate core(porous domain and solid domain), heat transfer between hot and cold fluid through solid domain. As I applied these boundary conditions, it shows backflow error. +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ****** Notice ****** | | A wall has been placed at portion(s) of an OUTLET | | boundary condition (at 100.0% of the faces, 100.0% of the area) | | to prevent fluid from flowing into the domain. | | The boundary condition name is: outlet_outlet_pipe_cold. | | The fluid name is: Water. | | If this situation persists, consider switching | | to an Opening type boundary condition instead. | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ and shows backflow at water domain, Fig.3. As I follow the error message and use opening boundary condition, it shows good flow but temperature reverse at outlet pipe, Fig.4. I cannot understand why this happens. When I applied domain interface, I have checked non-overlap condition as adiabatic, as you can see in Fig.5 of postprocessing, It shows zero heat flux at pipe. Anybody could help me please? I really want to solve this problem. Thank you in advance. |
|
January 5, 2021, 18:49 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,848
Rep Power: 144 |
I would model the water domain by itself until you find a reliable way to fix this problem. So remove the CO2 domain for now.
With a water only model I would try different boundary conditions and initial conditions - at least to get it started, and then changing over to the final boundary conditions once convergence is progressing nicely.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wall Temperature in Nozzle with RhoCentralFoam | Hillie | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | August 25, 2024 09:03 |
Expert Parameters in CFX-pre | ebrahem | FLUENT | 0 | December 20, 2019 03:39 |
Question about adaptive timestepping | Guille1811 | CFX | 25 | November 12, 2017 18:38 |
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions | Moinul Haque | CFX | 4 | November 25, 2014 18:30 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |