|
[Sponsors] |
May 18, 2019, 13:12 |
Particle mass calculation
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello,
I have different diameter particles stuck to a different surfaces and I would like to know what is the mass of particles that stuck to a particular surface. It's a steady simulation and I really cannot find the way to calculate it. BR |
|
May 20, 2019, 04:19 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28 |
May I assume that the particle exit the simulation when they hit these surfaces? Then I would go to Pre and define csv files (Output Control) with information of particles when they exit the simulation. You can add a lot of variables, including particle massflow.
|
|
May 20, 2019, 04:31 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9 |
Thank you for your help.
I have set surface bc in a way that these particles stuck to it as it's quite close to what really happens. Unfortunately CFX does not write info about masses as a default so I set appropriate expert parameter but now it's just impossible to set enough integer memory. I tried change alloc factor to 10 and it was not enough, still getting error either about integer memory or permission denied due to unknown reason (100 GB disk space available). I guess I need to play with Output Control. BR |
|
May 20, 2019, 04:43 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28 |
In output control, you can create histograms when particles end on a wall. Via Export you can create the csv files.
BTW, if you have restitution coefficients equal to 0, then I am quite sure that CFX write the massflow information just to the output file. Simply listed. Did you check this? However, if you have a particle size distribution, CFX will give the total mass of all particles in the output file, and not by classes. |
|
May 20, 2019, 04:48 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9 |
I checked it, good that you have mentioned particle size distribution. Yes, I have different particle diameters, presumably this is the reason why it's not that straightforward to pull these data.
BR |
|
May 20, 2019, 04:54 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28 |
Therefore, use the csv-files. This allows you to export the particle diameter and gives you all info you need.
|
|
May 20, 2019, 04:56 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9 |
I will try that.
Thank you again. BR |
|
May 20, 2019, 10:59 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
You saved me a lot of time, really appreciate your help. BR |
||
May 20, 2019, 11:05 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28 |
It is an advice I can give to everyone on this forum: read the output file.
Regs, Gert-Jan |
|
Tags |
cfx 19.2, particle data, post process |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inconsistencies in reading .dat file during run time in new injection model | Scram_1 | OpenFOAM | 0 | March 23, 2018 23:29 |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
How To Choose Particle Mass Flow Rate In CFX-Pre In Particle Transport Model? | Shomaz ul Haq | CFX | 2 | April 26, 2016 13:20 |
Solver for Multispecies Mass Transfer induced Domain growth/shrinkage | MonoC | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | March 13, 2016 08:41 |
particles leave domain | Steffen595 | CFX | 9 | March 7, 2016 17:19 |