|
[Sponsors] |
March 21, 2019, 22:56 |
rotational domain vs stationary domain
|
#1 |
New Member
Yang Pan
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11 |
hey guys, i'm using CFX simulating the flow through a hollow tube. The boundary conditions are total pressure and total temperature at the inlet and static pressure at the outlet. And inner surface rotates at 7000 r/min while the outer surface surface is stationary.
I tried two methods to solve this question: 1) the tube has a stationary frame type. Inner surface wall velocity is 7000 r/min. outer surface is still. 2) the tube has a rotational frame type. inner surface is still relative to rotational frame. outer surface wall velocity is counter rotating. other boundary conditions are all the same. the pressure on the inner surface using the first method appears a little larger than that using the second method according to the results. is it normal? what is the difference between this two methods? Hope some can help me. Sincerely |
|
March 21, 2019, 23:23 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
If the simulations are properly converged and validated they should give the same result. So you should check time step, mesh and convergence sensitivity before making conclusions about the results.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
March 22, 2019, 13:51 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
Have you selected the alternate rotation model?
|
|
March 25, 2019, 22:10 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Yang Pan
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11 |
thanks for reply, i'm new to cfx. what is alternate rotation model?
according to my simulation, the convergence of second method is rather poor. so i'm gonna use the first one. |
|
March 25, 2019, 22:13 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
From what you describe it would be expected that convergence in a rotational frame would be harder. Opaque's suggestion to use the alternate rotation model may have partly offset that. If you want to learn about the model (or any other CFX model) look in the CFX documentation.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
Tags |
frame type |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Domain Imbalance | HMR | CFX | 5 | October 10, 2016 06:57 |
Pressure distribution on a wall | darazsbence | CFX | 17 | October 6, 2015 11:38 |
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem | Sanyo | CFX | 17 | August 15, 2015 07:20 |
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Rotating Domain Problems | TWaung | CFX | 4 | May 1, 2012 04:14 |
CFX domain comparison | Kiat110616 | CFX | 4 | April 3, 2011 23:43 |