CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

rotational domain vs stationary domain

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 21, 2019, 22:56
Default rotational domain vs stationary domain
  #1
New Member
 
Yang Pan
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
payan is on a distinguished road
hey guys, i'm using CFX simulating the flow through a hollow tube. The boundary conditions are total pressure and total temperature at the inlet and static pressure at the outlet. And inner surface rotates at 7000 r/min while the outer surface surface is stationary.

I tried two methods to solve this question:
1) the tube has a stationary frame type. Inner surface wall velocity is 7000 r/min. outer surface is still.
2) the tube has a rotational frame type. inner surface is still relative to rotational frame. outer surface wall velocity is counter rotating.
other boundary conditions are all the same.

the pressure on the inner surface using the first method appears a little larger than that using the second method according to the results. is it normal? what is the difference between this two methods?

Hope some can help me. Sincerely
payan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2019, 23:23
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
If the simulations are properly converged and validated they should give the same result. So you should check time step, mesh and convergence sensitivity before making conclusions about the results.
payan likes this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2019, 13:51
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33
Opaque will become famous soon enough
Have you selected the alternate rotation model?
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 25, 2019, 22:10
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Yang Pan
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
payan is on a distinguished road
thanks for reply, i'm new to cfx. what is alternate rotation model?

according to my simulation, the convergence of second method is rather poor. so i'm gonna use the first one.
payan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 25, 2019, 22:13
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
From what you describe it would be expected that convergence in a rotational frame would be harder. Opaque's suggestion to use the alternate rotation model may have partly offset that. If you want to learn about the model (or any other CFX model) look in the CFX documentation.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
frame type


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Domain Imbalance HMR CFX 5 October 10, 2016 06:57
Pressure distribution on a wall darazsbence CFX 17 October 6, 2015 11:38
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 07:20
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Rotating Domain Problems TWaung CFX 4 May 1, 2012 04:14
CFX domain comparison Kiat110616 CFX 4 April 3, 2011 23:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:10.