|
[Sponsors] |
July 29, 2018, 13:08 |
Problem with boundary conditions
|
#1 |
Member
Hamda
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello,
In Geometry creating stage, I didn't spacify some of faces. I created a packed bed of spheres and then in order to specify domain, I created a box around the packed bed. Now in CFD modelling, I want to specify 4 sides of the packed bed as wall (symmetry), as 2 of 4 walls can be seen in the figure. But in CFX, there is no option to specify and name walls. Do I have to return to the first stage and name all faces? or in this current stage I can do it? Many thanks in advance. |
|
July 29, 2018, 19:32 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
In CFX-Pre for most mesh types it gives you access to the raw face names so you can define boundaries on faces you did not define explicitly in the mesh. One of the early CFX tutorials describes how to use the face picker tool in CFX-Pre to find raw face names.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
July 29, 2018, 21:38 |
|
#3 | |
Member
Hamda
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Like fluent, I know. I always do that in Fluent. but in CFX...I returned to the meshing stage and edit my mesh. CFX seems so complicated to me. Fluent is relatively easy for me. But for this project I have to use CFX. Thanks. Last edited by Hamda; July 29, 2018 at 22:08. Reason: I have to:) |
||
July 29, 2018, 22:29 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
My previous post tried to explain how you can select those faces directly. But if you have edited the mesh then you can do it that way.
CFX is far easier to use than Fluent in my experience. Once you get familiar with the basics of CFX you will probably agree.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
July 30, 2018, 14:12 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Hamda
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
well. I think you're right. for example in fluent if one of parameters is a function of time, we have to write UDF but in CFX, we can just write an expression and it is much easier than writing an UDF. Now I am reading CFX tutorial (14.5). I think it has worth. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Centrifugal fan-reverse flow in outlet lesds to a mass in flow field | xiexing | CFX | 3 | March 29, 2017 11:00 |
Out File does not show Imbalance in % | Mmaragann | CFX | 5 | January 20, 2017 11:20 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 07:28 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 18:44 |
Boundary conditions? | Tom | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 5, 2002 02:54 |