|
[Sponsors] |
February 11, 2017, 08:08 |
supersonic flow in vane channel
|
#1 |
Member
Alex
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi to all
Can anybody tell me what does mean the supersonic flow that I got in my axial compressor simulation? Is this effect a sign of something? It's strange that it took place in stationary domain. Velocity increases rapidly and then drops, static pressure drops and then rapidly increases, while total pressure increases smoothly as it should. The solution convergence is good, grid is fine. The worst (and the simplest) guess - wrong vane geometry, it won't be easy to check angles since I have only parasolid model and no draws. But if not - may be there's any trick to abide this step? May be to change any air parameters for some time steps and then return to previous values? Thank in advance |
|
February 11, 2017, 18:17 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
Is this a region where the flow goes supersonic then returns sonic again? If so it does not sound like a device running at high efficiency to me (if efficiency is what you are looking for).
|
|
February 12, 2017, 05:34 |
|
#3 |
Member
Alex
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 10 |
Yes, it returns to subsonic flow within stationary domain. And yes again, efficiency and massflow values are relatively low. But anyway, flow pattern is not normal even for low mode, am I right?
|
|
February 12, 2017, 06:00 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
I am no turbomachinery expert but if your design is doing that in flow regime where the device should be operating well - then I suggest the stator design is not very good. I suspect it is choking in the gaps between stator blades.
So it is not normal for well designed turbomachines, but for a poorly operating turbomachine it is an example of one type of problem you can face. |
|
February 13, 2017, 09:41 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 17 |
If your solution is right, the velocity contour obviously shows a shock wave in the stator.
|
|
February 13, 2017, 09:58 |
|
#6 |
Member
Alex
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 10 |
Glenn and Turbo,
thanks for your answers. I think this compressor just suffers from choking at mass flow rate about 3/5 of expected value. I think here's problem with geometry indeed... But can you tell me what stage I should check firstly? The place where shock wave was generated, or upstream? |
|
February 13, 2017, 10:32 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 17 |
Reduce the stator vane count.
|
|
February 13, 2017, 12:40 |
|
#8 |
Member
Alex
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 10 |
Oh, you mean to reduce number of vanes to increase the area between vanes that will lead to velocity decrease. I'll try it. But may be something is wrong with angles?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boundary condition problem for open channel flow | Andy | CFX | 9 | June 11, 2016 08:20 |
reverse flow occur while activating open channel flow boundary? | mariam.sara | Fluent Multiphase | 7 | April 26, 2015 08:24 |
back pressure at exit for supersonic flow | BigFrank | FLUENT | 6 | April 24, 2014 16:13 |
Flow in Supersonic MHD Channel | Antanas | CFX | 6 | February 13, 2012 15:49 |
compressible channel flow.. | R.D.Prabhu | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 17, 1998 18:23 |