|
[Sponsors] |
Variable RMS Value fluctuating but not converging. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 20, 2016, 18:56 |
Variable RMS Value fluctuating but not converging.
|
#1 |
New Member
Jaydeep Koradiya
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello, Everyone!
I am trying to simulate the 2D-flow around the cylinder with area blockage 0.01% in CFX (Structured Mesh). The Reynolds number is 0.5 Million. The boundary conditions I have is: Inlet : velocity (55.55 m/s) Outlet: static Pressure (0 atm) cylinder: wall (no-slip) farsides: wall (free-slip) sides: Symmetric Boundary conditions reference Pressure is the default 1 atm. Turbulence model: SST Time step: Physical time steps (0.0001 s) convergence criteria: 1e-6 The RMS values are fluctuating horizontally and not even close to convergence even after 3000 iterations. I need some advice to fix this problem. Thank you in advance! |
|
December 21, 2016, 05:12 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 22 |
Since you wrote "Time step: Physical time steps (0.0001 s)" and you have periodic fluctuations in the residuals Im guessing you are running steady-state simulation where vortex shedding appears? Try a transient simulation instead.
|
|
December 21, 2016, 06:54 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Jaydeep Koradiya
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello Lance, Thank you for the reply.
Yes, I am using steady state analysis because I want to find the mean drag force acting on the cylinder and there is vortex shedding in my case. Will I be able to calculate mean drag if I use transient simulation ? Thank you |
|
December 21, 2016, 07:09 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49 |
Your best chance for getting a converged steady-state solution in this case is by cutting your model in half and using a symmetry boundary condition. This will eliminate the large fluctuations from the vortex shedding without altering the solution from a RANS point of view.
If this still fails your only option is what Lance just wrote. |
|
December 21, 2016, 07:12 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
|
||
December 21, 2016, 07:39 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Jaydeep Koradiya
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
But due to vortex shedding, will not be any fluctuations in drag force too? I am following your approach but I see the drag plot line fluctuating too.
|
|
December 21, 2016, 07:41 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 22 |
||
December 21, 2016, 07:58 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Jaydeep Koradiya
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
Thank you, Could you please suggest if there is way in convergence criteria to monitor the time average of drag force (Normal force on cylinder (x))?
I would like to make it my convergence criteria. |
|
December 21, 2016, 08:22 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 22 |
See "21.1.5.1.8.8. [Monitor Name]: Monitor Statistics" in the cfx-pre manual.
Make an expression on drag force, monitor the standard deviation over a certain time. Im not sure you can make CFX stop when the standard deviation is less than a threshold, but you can at least monitor it. |
|
December 21, 2016, 09:53 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,873
Rep Power: 33 |
Create an interruption control using a logical expression along the lines of
probe(ExpressionValue.Standard Deviation)@MyMonitorExpression < MyToleranceValue Please check documentation for accurate syntax |
|
December 21, 2016, 14:00 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 18 |
Ansys posted video on its youtube channel about it. Here is the link:
ANSYS CFX: Using Derived Variables and Monitor Statistics to Set Up an interrupt Control |
|
January 16, 2017, 09:19 |
|
#12 |
Member
Alex
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 10 |
||
January 16, 2017, 09:43 |
|
#13 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49 |
Only pseudo-2D with a volume mesh and a thickness of 1 cell. Fluent on the other hand has real 2D solvers. I don't think that a 2D solver will be added to CFX any time soon.
|
|
January 16, 2017, 21:58 |
|
#14 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
FAQ: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy..._simulation.3F
With ANSYS AIM coming along there is no chance CFX will get real 2D simulations. I have not looked at ANSYS AIM in detail - can it do 2D simulations? |
|
Tags |
cfx 17.1, converge, residuals |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Graph of RMS residue not converging | redza010 | CFX | 1 | August 3, 2012 09:54 |
emag beta feature: charge density | charlotte | CFX | 4 | March 22, 2011 10:14 |
error in COMSOL:'ERROR:6164 Duplicate Variable' | bhushas | COMSOL | 1 | May 30, 2008 05:35 |
Env variable not set | gruber2 | OpenFOAM Installation | 5 | December 30, 2005 05:27 |
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair | lego | CFX | 3 | November 5, 2002 21:09 |