CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

flow equation in CFX and S. analysis

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 27, 2016, 16:36
Default flow equation in CFX and S. analysis
  #1
Senior Member
 
yaseen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hawler
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 11
yaseen wsu is on a distinguished road
dear all
first question
is there any difference if multiphase volume fraction coupled (there is five equation in cfx solver), but if this option is discleared (four equation in cfx solver, p with velocity in u v w), what is the idea behind them, because in Naiver stokes eq. there are velocity (u,v,w) and pressure with (sources)
second question
in most of the posts in the forum, the responser of the questions talked about sensitivity analysis for mesh, time step, please Iam a Msc student my time is limited is there is a pdf or link, on sensitivity analysis, till now I dont know S.A. for mesh and convergence.
thanks for your help
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/att...1&d=1459107553
yaseen wsu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 28, 2016, 19:23
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The volume fraction coupling option does not change the Navier Stokes equations. It just determines whether the volume fraction equations are solved in the same linear solver matrix as the momentum and pressure equations (making an even bigger matrix), or if they are solved separately (which does not require such large matrixes, but does make coupling the equations a bit harder in some cases).
yaseen wsu likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 29, 2016, 02:55
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
yaseen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hawler
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 11
yaseen wsu is on a distinguished road
thanks for your reply, can you answer the above second question about sensitivity analysis
yaseen wsu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 29, 2016, 20:57
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
A basic sensitivity analysis is you adjust an input parameter (convergence tolerance, time step size, mesh size etc) and see its effect on an output which is important to you. That output could be pressure loss or drag or whatever is important in your case. You refine the input parameter until the output parameter has converged such that the changes in output is small enough that it is acceptable for your requirements.

But this is only a simple exercise. There are much more rigorous and effect (and faster) ways of doing it if you are prepared to do some research. The book "Computational Fluid Dynamics" by Roache is the seminal textbook on CFD accuracy. This link also has some more detailed discussion: http://journaltool.asme.org/Template...umAccuracy.pdf
yaseen wsu likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compressible Flow in Ansys CFX bcheruk CFX 15 July 6, 2017 07:30
Calculation of the Governing Equations Mihail CFX 7 September 7, 2014 07:27
Blood flow analysis kmgraju FLUENT 0 May 20, 2011 03:19
Barotropic Flow Analysis CFX Claudio2010 CFX 9 October 26, 2009 18:00
ic engine in-cylinder gas flow analysis george thomas CFX 5 January 29, 2008 08:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:11.