|
[Sponsors] |
Mesh independence study for transient simulation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 21, 2015, 11:06 |
Mesh independence study for transient simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
Tom
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello,
I want to set up a simulation in transient mode and to get good results I want to do a mesh independence study. Do I have to do the mesh study in transient mode or can I select a value and do the study in steady mode? Thank you! |
|
September 21, 2015, 18:32 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
You have to have a flow with the same characteristics as your intended flow. If you can do this with steady state then do so because it is much quicker.
|
|
September 22, 2015, 03:21 |
|
#3 | |
Member
N B Khan
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
You mean that mesh independence study for transient study can be validated on Steady state problem... As steady state problem is quicker.. |
||
September 22, 2015, 04:11 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Yes, that is correct.
If the transient flow is a boundary layer flow with a BL thickness of Xmm then over a bluff body, and if your steady state flow is also a BL with thickness about Xmm then over a bluff body - then a mesh sensitivity study on the steady state flow should be valid for the transient flow. But if your flow is inherently transient (eg some shock waves, free surface waves, natural convection) then you cannot use the steady state flow. |
|
September 22, 2015, 05:19 |
|
#5 | |
Member
N B Khan
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Sir , I am a bit new here and also have a lot of searching and browsing..but still confuse in few areas... How we can find BL thickness? |
||
September 22, 2015, 07:20 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
||
September 22, 2015, 09:06 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Tom
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11 |
First of all: thank you for the information guys.
My setup is actually the air flow through a diffuser with some impacts on velocity and pressure that can only be seen in a transient simulation. So I guess I have to do the mesh study in transient mode. |
|
November 17, 2022, 02:04 |
steady mesh study instead of transient for fsi case
|
#8 |
Member
naji
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 4 |
HI guys
im doing a fsi modelling which i should first do the mesh study and then continue ive been told i can do it in reynolds max condition,i dont know how? from which type of solution should i get max Reynolds? at first? and what does max Reynolds condition mean overally? just to enter max velocity and run the solution? how does it make difference? |
|
November 17, 2022, 02:09 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
I do not understand your question.
Are you asking whether you should check the mesh sensitivity at the maximum Reynolds Number you are interested in? If so the answer is yes, you should check that condition if other Reynolds numbers goes into other regimes (eg transitional turbulence) then you should check them as well. But often just checking the highest Reynolds Number is OK, as that is likely to require the finest mesh.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
November 17, 2022, 02:12 |
|
#10 |
Member
naji
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 4 |
thanks for your quick reply.
sorry i will ask it on fluent forum i made a mistake again. |
|
Tags |
ansys, independence, mesh, study |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gambit problems | Althea | FLUENT | 22 | January 4, 2017 04:19 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
Airfoil simulation solution interfered by mesh | Dvergr | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | September 28, 2014 03:05 |
Best parameter for GCI mesh independence study? | mich_K | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 9, 2014 06:34 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Any way around mesh study using mesh stats? | Torque_Converter | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 5 | June 4, 2012 11:07 |