|
[Sponsors] |
September 15, 2015, 04:18 |
transient convergence
|
#1 |
New Member
mohsen
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
hi. im trying to simulate a transient submerged hydraulic jump but im not sure about the transient convergence i sent some pics of residual convergence of my simulate. is it good or not? caz its different with steady state and i cant find any criteria for transient convergence.
best regards http://www.4shared.com/photo/TYAEq5y9ce/1_online.html http://www.4shared.com/photo/uc_vuYwoba/2_online.html http://www.4shared.com/photo/hofr3NfNce/3_online.html http://www.4shared.com/photo/U_UPtUloba/4_online.html http://www.4shared.com/photo/1kYygJ3Ace/5_online.html |
|
September 15, 2015, 05:00 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
|
||
September 15, 2015, 05:26 |
|
#3 |
Member
pkladisios
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 11 |
What is your residual target (found in CFX-pre, solver control)? If it's default (1.0e-04), it looks like it's fluctuating around your solution. Also, as Antanas mentioned imbalances are importand. An additional image would help. While solver manager is running, right-click next to the tabs, add new monitor and create an imbalances plot.
|
|
September 15, 2015, 08:41 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
mohsen
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
the RSM courant number is about 0.67 and max courant number is about 10.2 in each time step. wich one of them is criteria between 2 and 10 as i know...max courant number right? can i make the convergence better with better courant number? how much is good for RSM and MAX courant number? |
||
September 15, 2015, 08:46 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
mohsen
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
in new monitor there is just plot monitor - residual monitor - text monitor and time corrected monitor....what do u mean by imbalances monitor with making new monitor? can i improve the convergence with reducing timestep? how much is good for RSM and MAX courant number? |
||
September 15, 2015, 08:54 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
Note that for final results it's recommended to set RMS residuals target to <= 1e-5 or MAX residuals <= 1e-4. If target values can not be reached within 3-5 coef. loops it's recommended to reduce timestep size rather than increase number of loops. However, complex physics may require more loops. Recommended average values for CN are 2 – 10, in some cases higher values are acceptable. |
||
September 15, 2015, 08:59 |
|
#7 |
Member
pkladisios
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 11 |
From my limited, mind you, understanding i think that residuals must progressively drop below or move along your residual target. In your case, the residuals move "around" your residual target, which i' m not so sure it's acceptable. Achieving the desired residuals is a necessary condition but in some complex cases like conjugate heat transfer the the imbalances must also be maintained low (around 0,1 % is considered very good) for the solution to be considered valid. Along with your diagrams you might another one which shows the imbalances. It could help a more experienced user to help you. Concerning the Courant number, all i know is that it is an indicator on how the flow advances. Large numbers means that fluid particles move rapidly which could lead to divergence. It's directly relevant to the time step size, so reducing it would generally reduce the Courant number.
In order to improve convergence you must do a number of things, if reducing the time step won't suffice. Better meshing, more iterations per time step (solver control, min-max iterations), tighter residual target (1.0e-05-1.0e-05) are among these things, more accurate initial conditions, boundary conditions that might be wrong etc. In complex problems like multiphase conjugate heat transfer flow, you won't believe how much mesh affects the system. I hope you'll figure it out. edit: i stand corrected by Antanas on the matter of residual targets. Last edited by pkladisios; September 15, 2015 at 09:05. Reason: omission |
|
September 15, 2015, 09:16 |
|
#8 |
New Member
mohsen
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
tnx Antanas and pkladisios. it seems i must reduce timestep and changing the mesh to improving convergenc
|
|
September 15, 2015, 11:18 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Maxim
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 413
Rep Power: 13 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to confirm convergence transient VOF ? | josephmp | FLUENT | 0 | April 26, 2015 00:40 |
Convergence Criteria for first Timestep in transient run | aerost | CFX | 3 | February 19, 2013 05:01 |
transient case diverged all of a sudden after already convergence | wc34071209 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 12, 2012 07:55 |
Convergence for a transient problem | jgrisham | FLUENT | 0 | July 17, 2012 12:47 |
Transient axial rotor/stator convergence issue? | Nicola Viscanti | CFX | 3 | March 17, 2010 05:15 |