|
[Sponsors] |
In CFX-post, how to obtain the mass flow rate of a cross section |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 30, 2015, 09:47 |
In CFX-post, how to obtain the mass flow rate of a cross section
|
#1 |
New Member
Bruce Xiao
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 11 |
In CFX-post, how to obtain the mass flow rate of a cross section?
|
|
April 30, 2015, 19:34 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Go to function calculator and choose the massflow function.
|
|
January 23, 2022, 18:19 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 6 |
||
January 23, 2022, 18:30 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
I presume by "zone" you mean a boundary face.
For simple flat faces volume flow rate is areaInt(Normal Velocity)@Zone Face, where you replace Normal Velocity with the velocity direction and Zone Face with the appropriate name. You can do curved faces as well, but they will require a bit more thought.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
January 24, 2022, 11:04 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
However, I am confused when it comes to actual selection of the surface and/or velocity. See the attached snapshot. The 2 methods give different answers, whereas I imagined it should give the same volume flow. What is the difference between them? Regards |
||
January 24, 2022, 11:44 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
In the first one, you are asking for
Area integral along Z direction of the velocity magnitude on the second one, you are asking for the Area integral of Velocity along the Z direction
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
January 24, 2022, 13:57 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 6 |
So which one is the correct value for volume flow through the window? I observed two formulae in literature (see image), does any of my earlier expression calculate this?
|
|
January 24, 2022, 14:51 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
Neither of those is correct (generically). The formalism is
massFlow()@Boundary / Density or you could also create an expression VdotN = Velocity u * Normal X + Velocity v * Normal Y + Velocity w * Normal Z then areaInt (VdotN)@Boundary I assume you are working with an incompressible fluid (constant density) since volume flow rate does not mean much (to me) for compressible fluids.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. Last edited by Opaque; January 24, 2022 at 15:53. |
|
October 18, 2024, 07:59 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 10 |
To calculate massFlow()@Boundary, CFX determine velocity, normal to boundary?
|
|
October 18, 2024, 08:18 |
|
#10 | |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
|
||
October 18, 2024, 15:20 |
|
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
Quote:
areaInt(VdotN)@Inlet will use velocity and Normal at the boundary named Inlet areaInt(density*VdotN)@Inlet will use density, velocity and normal vector at the boundary named Inlet.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
||
Tags |
cfx mass flow rate |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX turbo - Mass flow rate | Vashishth Patel | CFX | 7 | April 3, 2014 21:33 |
Convergence problem with target mass flow rate | ADL | FLUENT | 2 | May 29, 2012 22:11 |
Discrete Phase & Mass Flow Rate | MagnusZeus | FLUENT | 0 | December 2, 2011 18:57 |
How to change from mass flow to volume flow rate | stanley | FLUENT | 1 | February 2, 2007 07:44 |
How to obtain mass flow rate of one phase | Derek Jing | FLUENT | 1 | May 31, 2002 14:18 |